sonofUT62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 10,794
- Likes
- 18,420
You said the Muslim Hitler wants to kill you and am Americans yet you don't feel threatened? How is war a touchy subject of that's true?Evidently it is touchy subject or there wouldn’t be 780 pages in a thread with differing opinions about it.
And no I’ve never felt threatened by Iran or Iranians.
What happened to complaints about people only caring about themselves and not about others. Iranian citizens and Iranian American citizens matter whether you think they should or not.
Yes. “Death to America”. I can not like it and want him gone without feeling directly threatened, while realizing the threat to others.You said the Muslim Hitler wants to kill you and am Americans yet you don't feel threatened? How is war a touchy subject of that's true?
The job of the US is not to invade every country where citizens are being treated unfairly. Let's worry about our own house
![]()
Iran regime uses war to mask 'brutal' execution surge against political opponents
A State Department spokesperson called Iran's executions 'barbaric' as the United Nations and activists group report the regime is using the death penalty to crush dissent.www.foxnews.com
Hirohito's capitulation was contingent on retaining his crown. He's on record as stating he would have allowed the war to continue without that guarantee. His PM, Hideki Tojo, was about the only member of the cabinet wanting to continue the fight with the U.S. The other war ministers accepted defeat was inevitable. They wanted a conditional surrender where they kept Manchuria. They held no notion of retaining much of anything else.Actually it was the other way around, his inner circle was pushing to continue and it was Hirohito that wanted the war to end immediately
The battle of Berlin would have made Stalingrad look like a minor skirmish had most the Wehrmacht and half the SS not folded. Even Himmler tried to cut a deal when he realized how far the Allies were willing to go.Is that why the German Army was surrendering in mass during the spring of 1945?
Death to America basically just means F America. It has no real meaning besides propaganda. There is no real threat and there definitely was no imminent threatYes. “Death to America”. I can not like it and want him gone without feeling directly threatened, while realizing the threat to others.
I do agree worry about our own house. Just didnt ever hear those words prior to Trump as we worried much more about supporting illegal immigrants than our own house.
See hog? That's how it should be done.You and @McDad are correct. Total war works for the winning side. Unfortunately at the cost of civilian casualties, the winning side has to demonstrated their willingness to follow ththrough.
Hirohito's capitulation was contingent on retaining his crown. He's on record as stating he would have allowed the war to continue without that guarantee. His PM, Hideki Tojo, was about the only member of the cabinet wanting to continue the fight with the U.S. The other war ministers accepted defeat was inevitable. They wanted a conditional surrender where they kept Manchuria. They held no notion of retaining much of anything else.
The battle of Berlin would have made Stalingrad look like a minor skirmish had most the Wehrmacht and half the SS not folded. Even Himmler tried to cut a deal when he realized how far the Allies were willing to go.
You and @McDad are correct. Total war works for the winning side. Unfortunately at the cost of civilian casualties, the winning side has to demonstrated their willingness to follow through.
Iranian citizens don't seem to matter much to our leaders, given the way we keep blowing up schools, bridges and other civilian infrastructure and keep threatening to blow up their power and water sources and send them "back to the Stone Age"What happened to complaints about people only caring about themselves and not about others. Iranian citizens and Iranian American citizens matter whether you think they should or not.
I completely agree with your last statement - we need a third party in the worst way.Some of us hoped the GOP had reformed since the Neocons were run out of the Party in disgrace. Nope. They are back in power (now under the guise of Zionists) and back to doing what they do best, bringing death, destruction and destablization to the World. And they will be routed in coming elections, as they were in 2008 and 2012.
We need a viable third Party in the worst way.
Probably does want more money for military and defense. Having billions more available would’ve been nice had Dems going unchecked not bilked all of us, including you, of billions for bs spent on much less important stuff like muppet shows and circumcisions in Africa or Learing centers in Minnesota, which you and your peers conventiently ignore.
The DOD can't pass and audit and has billions missing. They make the Dems look like rank amateurs when it comes to waste and financial incompetenceProbably does want more money for military and defense. Having billions more available would’ve been nice had Dems going unchecked not bilked all of us, including you, of billions for bs spent on much less important stuff like muppet shows and circumcisions in Africa or Learing centers in Minnesota, which you and your peers conventiently ignore.
