$200B should do the trick, shouldn't it?Military spending is out of control and spending more on it won't make our military more effective. You don't throw money after bad investments once they turn out to be obviously bad.
I mean FFS, we can't even build the missiles we're using right now at a decent clip, despite billions in "investment" (read: unreasonably lining the pockets of officers, politicians, lobbyists, and contractors).
America isn’t police of the world. We need to worry less about foreign affairs when our country is crumblingEvidently it is touchy subject or there wouldn’t be 780 pages in a thread with differing opinions about it.
And no I’ve never felt threatened by Iran or Iranians.
What happened to complaints about people only caring about themselves and not about others. Iranian citizens and Iranian American citizens matter whether you think they should or not.

Tough **** bridge had to go down so we can protect the Iranian people. Schools, medical buildings etc, gotta go. For the people like they saidIran's Tallest Bridge Collapses After Reported US Airstrikes; Iran Threatens American Allies in retaliation
Iran's IRGC reportedly identified bridges in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Abu Dhabi as potential targets
By Bonny Chu Fox News
Iran’s biggest bridge near Tehran has crashed down in a stunning scene captured on camera following reports of U.S. airstrikes, President Donald Trump announced Thursday, as he pressed the regime to make a deal before tensions escalate further.
The B1 highway bridge, a key link between Iran’s capital and the western city of Karaj, is considered the tallest in the Middle East and was only inaugurated earlier this year.
Iranian state TV reportedly warned of potential retaliation, claiming the state's military has identified multiple bridges in American-allied Middle East nations as targets, according to Iran International.
Trump posted a video on social media capturing a massive plume of smoke and debris after the bridge’s apparent collapse.
The strike on the bridge was aimed at cutting drone and missile supply lines to Iranian firing units targeting U.S. and Israeli forces, Middle East outlet i24NEWS reported, citing sources.
![]()
Iran's tallest bridge collapses after reported US airstrikes, Iran threatens American allies in retaliation
Iran's biggest bridge near Tehran crashes down following reported U.S. airstrikes as Trump presses the regime to make a deal before escalation.www.foxnews.com
Iran's been giving passes to ships of states they deem non-hostile. PRC's probably on the list. I'm sure they're enjoying the show too. But it may all end shortly. Will Iran sabo their facilities on Kharg if we move to take it?The key to opening the Strait is China. 40% of their oil comes through it. But my guess is they are really enjoying watching us trip over our own dick
Both surrendered because they were defeated militarily, not because their populations were demoralized. That war crime crap's not effective strategy.Hirohito's capitulation was contingent on retaining his crown. He's on record as stating he would have allowed the war to continue without that guarantee. His PM, Hideki Tojo, was about the only member of the cabinet wanting to continue the fight with the U.S. The other war ministers accepted defeat was inevitable. They wanted a conditional surrender where they kept Manchuria. They held no notion of retaining much of anything else.
The battle of Berlin would have made Stalingrad look like a minor skirmish had most the Wehrmacht and half the SS not folded. Even Himmler tried to cut a deal when he realized how far the Allies were willing to go.
You and @McDad are correct. Total war works for the winning side. Unfortunately at the cost of civilian casualties, the winning side has to demonstrated their willingness to follow through.
I think it would have looked a lot different had the remaining Germans actually been equipped. most of the surrenders were literally because they literally couldn't fight anymore. no guns, ammo, no fuel for vehicles, no medical supplies, no support, heck most didn't even have food.Hirohito's capitulation was contingent on retaining his crown. He's on record as stating he would have allowed the war to continue without that guarantee. His PM, Hideki Tojo, was about the only member of the cabinet wanting to continue the fight with the U.S. The other war ministers accepted defeat was inevitable. They wanted a conditional surrender where they kept Manchuria. They held no notion of retaining much of anything else.
The battle of Berlin would have made Stalingrad look like a minor skirmish had most the Wehrmacht and half the SS not folded. Even Himmler tried to cut a deal when he realized how far the Allies were willing to go.
You and @McDad are correct. Total war works for the winning side. Unfortunately at the cost of civilian casualties, the winning side has to demonstrated their willingness to follow through.
most of Japan's army was stuck in China with no way to pull out. by that point they had also lost most of the territory they had for materials, and little to no way to get what they still had back to Japan. The American submarine effort in the Pacific goes largely uncredited for their oversized role in the win.Both surrendered because they were defeated militarily, not because their populations were demoralized. That war crime crap's not effective strategy.
But Wiles, according to two White House sources, was concerned aides were giving the President a rose-colored view of how the war was being perceived domestically, telling Trump what he wanted to hear instead of what he needed to hear.
The mounting political and economic toll has left him looking for an off-ramp, according to two advisers and two members of Congress who have spoken to him during the last week. Trump told them he wants to wind down the campaign, wary of a protracted conflict that could hobble Republicans heading into the midterms. At the same time, he wants the operation to be a decisive success. Allies say he is searching for a way to declare victory, halt the fighting, and hope that economic conditions stabilize before the political damage hardens.
And yet behind the bluster has been a growing recognition within the West Wing that the situation may be slipping out of its control. Key Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, were surprised by the barrage of retaliatory attacks Tehran launched against U.S. and Israeli targets across the region, including in countries long assumed to be off-limits: Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar, a state that had both harbored Iran’s terrorist proxies and served as a conduit for backchannel diplomacy between the U.S. and Hamas. The response shattered the assumption that Tehran would confine itself to performative retaliation. In internal deliberations before the war’s launch, Hegseth had pointed to Iran's muted reaction to Trump’s past attacks as evidence that calibrated force could impose costs on Tehran without triggering a broader war. Hegseth “was caught off guard. There’s no question,” says a person familiar with his thinking.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a champion of military aggression against Iran, had a different idea of how things might go. Over the last six months, Netanyahu repeatedly told Trump that the past successes against Iran should serve as a prelude for a more sustained, final campaign, an Israeli official tells TIME. On Feb. 11, Netanyahu came to Washington for a private meeting with the President that stretched for hours. “We’ve come this far, Donald,” Netanyahu told Trump, according to a source present. “We have to finish what we started.”
The article was more about the gun having a 30 minute cool down to reload after firing 30 1 second burst, meaning that sending 31 drones against one could take it out. It also touched on the fact that not every 1 second burst was bringing down a drone.The US military is in danger of running out of 20mm
![]()
