Hat Crimes

[Boston Vol]

Sarah Palin's PAC Puts Gun Sights On Democrats She's Targeting In 2010 | HuffPost

There most certainly was a map, Dumb F (see above.) That Washington Post story you linked says there was a crosshairs map (see above) but no one can say for sure it actually inspired Gafford's shooter. Do you see the above? Stop believing the alt-right media.

He never denied that there was a map. He called You out on your bullsh*t statement that said that Giffords face was placed underneath crosshairs. That’s undeniably false.

 

[InVOLuntary]

Per our liberal posters the kid deserved it

Ends justify the means

 

[37L1]

He never denied that there was a map. He called You out on your bullsh*t statement that said that Giffords face was placed underneath crosshairs. That’s undeniably false.

What do you expect from Purple Nurple?

 

[LouderVol]

Even if you are right, and I don't really care, that doesn't change how stupid THIS thread is. You have a group of posters blaming people besides those who actually committed the acts of violence. What you are doing with that, is essentially giving the guilty party an excuse for their actions. It's stupid and pathetic.

Demands evidence, is provided said evidence, and then declares he doesnt care about the evidence.....

Bham hasnt excused anyone. Commenting on the subject matter of the thread in the thread is the entire point. Meanwhile you are in here throwing deflection around to avoid apparent facts in the thread that no one of any leaning should be ok with.

 

[RavinDave]

No doubt. He is one of the smarter ones on this board.

That is also my impression.

 

[1972 Grad]

Sarah Palin's PAC Puts Gun Sights On Democrats She's Targeting In 2010 | HuffPost

There most certainly was a map, Dumb F (see above.) That Washington Post story you linked says there was a crosshairs map (see above) but no one can say for sure it actually inspired Gafford's shooter. Do you see the above? Stop believing the alt-right media.

You said "Giffords' face under gunsight crosshairs." Never f*****g happened.

You have added the pictures at the bottom. The map had 20 different districts (no pictures of people) pinpointed with "principal points" not crosshairs. Those are surveyor's symbols, which is what you find on maps.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Right. There's no way putting Gabby's face under gun sight crosshairs (admittedly so according to Sarah) could have made ANYONE think about shooting her.

Sarah Palin's PAC Puts Gun Sights On Democrats She's Targeting In 2010 | HuffPost

There most certainly was a map, Dumb F (see above.) That Washington Post story you linked says there was a crosshairs map (see above) but no one can say for sure it actually inspired Gafford's shooter. Do you see the above? Stop believing the alt-right media.

Where was Gabby's face under gun sights?

 

[1972 Grad]

Where was Gabby's face under gun sights?

Her picture was also not at the bottom of the map. Nobody's was, and those "gunsights" are surveyor's symbols.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Her picture was also not at the bottom of the map. Nobody's was, and those "gunsights" are surveyor's symbols.

Yah. I'm wondering where he's getting his info.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Yah. I'm wondering where he's getting his info.

Sme place all the Dimwits get their info. They make it up to fit the narrative.

 

[Purple Tiger]

Her picture was also not at the bottom of the map. Nobody's was, and those "gunsights" are surveyor's symbols.

Right. Because Palin was suggesting they should measure land.

 

[37L1]

Right. Because Palin was suggesting they should measure land.

So where is the congresswoman's face that supposedly was there under the "crosshairs"?

Stop doubling down on stupid, Purple Nurple.

 

[DancingOutlaw]

Right. Because Palin was suggesting they should measure land.

That sounds more reasonable than your angle that she was suggesting people be murdered.

 

[Purple Tiger]

That sounds more reasonable than your angle that she was suggesting people be murdered.

More reasonable but less true....

 

[DancingOutlaw]

More reasonable but less true....

 

[615vols]

More reasonable but less true....

Less true? Kind of like you saying her face was under crosshairs. Nice job clown

 

[volfanhill]

More reasonable but less true....

You need to learn to take a L or produce the image you are claiming existed

 

[volfanhill]

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

Won’t be considered a hate crime I’m betting...

 

[Pacer92]

Unbelievable! Losing confidence in American society..

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Unbelievable! Losing confidence in American society..

How about just charging them with a crime of assault and play the video in court. Wouldn't matter if it was 5 white kids it's obviously driven by hate. Charge em try them and let the rough end drag.

 

[Mick]

Iowa Woman Ran Down Teen With Car Because She Was ‘Mexican’: Police

Franklin drove her 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee onto the sidewalk near the middle school, where the girl was walking “on the way to an activity.”

 

[volbeast33]

Iowa Woman Ran Down Teen With Car Because She Was ‘Mexican’: Police

Franklin drove her 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee onto the sidewalk near the middle school, where the girl was walking “on the way to an activity.”

That’s crazy..... she needs to be sent away for a really long time... I hope that girl is ok.

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

Iowa Woman Ran Down Teen With Car Because She Was ‘Mexican’: Police

Franklin drove her 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee onto the sidewalk near the middle school, where the girl was walking “on the way to an activity.”

Was she wearing a hat?

 

[volfanjustin]

I've never seen ole mick expressing any outrage over in the thread where people post about immigrants, usually illegal killing/raping/molesting citizens. Interesting.