UT's#1Fan
Senior Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 4,829
- Likes
- 1,003
I generally don't care about these errors, but this really bothers me for some reason. Perhaps it's the general tone of this thread.
haha no. The English language is constant (and has been for quite some time). If someone chooses to speak it incorrectly, they're the one with the issue regardless of how many other people also choose to sound ignorant.
The funny thing is you actually agree with this, but because this kid and other score TD's on Saturday, you give them a pass.
That's a description of dialect ... not language.No language is constant except a dead one, like Latin. A living language changes because the people using it experience culture changes. Said changes can include migrating to a different environment where they must create terms for new things. It also includes contact with other cultures where language components of cultures get integrated with each other in either straight form, corrupted form, or combined into an existing term. Changes also occur because each generation adds its own terminology, altered meaning (slang, idioms etc) and rules of usage. There's more but you get the idea. A dead language can't do this so will indeed be constant, but living language can't be constant no matter how much it tries to me. Further, American English especially, has so much borrowed from other languages, one could debate whether English is really English anymore. And finally, JJ and other Afro-Americans aren't the only ones who jargonize English. Just listen to a Valley girl, a born and bred Texan, a Bronx resident, or a Canadian from Ontario and another one from Alberta. English isn't constant because the people who use it are in perpetual states of change by virtue of region, environmental induced usage, and generation changes. Think of it as a mutating computer virus.
That's a description of dialect ... not language.
Dialect is part of language and very much a reason language changes. Duck and dodge all you want, it doesn't alter facts. It's the reason Webster's Dictionary has to add or modify word meanings every several years or so. No living language is constant.
This is drifting from Jennings, but...
BY DEFINITION:
Language ... 1.the method of human communication, either spoken or written, consisting of the use of words in a structured and conventional way.
Dialect ... a particular form of a language that is peculiar to a specific region or social group.
I hope Jennings is able to communicate in a manner that would suggest he is able to continue his educational progress. If not, he will be an academic casualty as well as his self-inflicted purgatory for the rant.
No language is constant except a dead one, like Latin. A living language changes because the people using it experience culture changes. Said changes can include migrating to a different environment where they must create terms for new things. It also includes contact with other cultures where language components of cultures get integrated with each other in either straight form, corrupted form, or combined into an existing term. Changes also occur because each generation adds its own terminology, altered meaning (slang, idioms etc) and rules of usage. There's more but you get the idea. A dead language can't do this so will indeed be constant, but living language can't be constant no matter how much it tries to me. Further, American English especially, has so much borrowed from other languages, one could debate whether English is really English anymore. And finally, JJ and other Afro-Americans aren't the only ones who jargonize English. Just listen to a Valley girl, a born and bred Texan, a Bronx resident, or a Canadian from Ontario and another one from Alberta. English isn't constant because the people who use it are in perpetual states of change by virtue of region, environmental induced usage, and generation changes. Think of it as a mutating computer virus.