The key word in this is "implicated." I have been implicated in some pretty messed up stuff and thats just by my wife. Anybody can say anything. That being said, our last coach was, hands down, the greatest in the country at drawing attention to himself and to the program. The problem was, IMHO, I think he honestly believed that any attention was good. However, he was not an idiot. He either thought Cecil was being too cavalier about the process or he didnt like the price. Which, btw, if you had started a thread on VN the night before NSD and could guarantee everyone on here that we could pay a player $175K and guarantee we would have another crystal football in the case by next January, you would have had it within a couple of hours. Well, our last coach would have paid it out of his pocket just as quickly. Cam may be the only one other than him that knows whether he was really offered and, if so, how much was offered. He would have wanted that to be one of those last second surprises ]Posted via VolNatio
I'm not sure Kiffin thought he needed a 3rd QB in the mix. He had Simms and Bray competing for the starting job. I dont see Kiffin changing his offense around to showcase Cam's running ability the way Auburn did. Auburn was really an ideal fit for him, plus you have to give Auburn's OC a lot of credit for retooling his offense around Cam Newton. :twocents:
We disagree as to why. Possibilities include:
1) We lost out in the Newton pay-for-play "sweepstakes" (after all, many of the posters on this site, claim it's "obvious" Auburn is "guilty" and "must have" paid Newton to get him to commit there);
2) We got cold feet when the NCAA came sniffing around in the early fall of 2009;
3) We decided Matt Simms was so much better than Newton that Simms deserved an offer and Newton didn't.
I consider #2 the most plausible of the 3.
The tapes are supposed to come out in about 2 weeks. Problem is, what are they doing. Editing? Supposedly, you can hear Cam in the background. Wonder if UT would consider suing Cecil/Cam if they know it's bs. One of you lawyers or law students let me know, if you don't mind, if it's possible.
Agreed. Unless there's actual evidence UT tried to buy Cam, there's no reason anything would happen.What would be the basis of a lawsuit?
Supposedly the tapes will be analyzed by voice experts tomorrow. Who cares if Cecil mentions UT? It proves nothing except that Cecil was trying to make Cams buyer move faster and/or pay more. It happens all the time (Buy now or these others will). Doesnt mean its true.
Not pretending to know anything about the legal system, but he clearly meant on the basis of libel/slander.
However, I don't know if that would hold up, since this was allegedly in a private conversation, not publicly written or spoken.
Cam really wasn't the type of QB Tennessee was looking for. No one could have predicted that he would be a Heisman winning and National Championship QB and Tennessee was looking for a pro-style QB. Why would Tennessee pay 150,000 for a guy they didn't think fit their system?
Who's to say that Cecil Newton wasn't just claiming that Tennessee offered to drive up the price for Cam to another school?
I would be surprised if there was a tape of someone from Tennessee offering Cam money. That would be pretty stupid. If it's just evidence that Cecil claimed Tennessee, offered, then who cares? The NCAA already knows Cecil claimed Auburn offered and it didn't do a damn thing. And are these tapes even new evidence? Or are these the tapes we've known about for a long time that somebody pathetically tried to bring up again?A fellow Vol fan ask me today if I heard that its being said one of our people offered cam newton money to play here,and its on tape?
If this is true can we get in big trouble?
Ok what scum bag would even want to record this crap? I mean who does that? Geez. The witch hunt is on. I dont think kiffen had anything to do with it. Kiffy had to know the crap was going down at usc. Plus kiffin was all about a pro-style qb.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
