Um... no. I am taking your words for what they mean. You said that Jones was looking for a reason to start QD. I didn't make that up. You suggested that the rules favored him... but both guys played under the same rules.
I honestly do not care who wins the job. Both seem like good guys who are working hard to earn it. But I do not think there's any conspiracy on Jones' part to start QD... nor do I think there's anything that proves the difference in performance was due to the rules. In fact, some of QD's best plays were when he broke the pocket and hit receivers for good gains. That is good decision making... not a rules advantage.
Jones has acknowledged that they played to Dobbs' strengths. IIRC, he has the highest number of carries per game of any QB Jones' has had... and it isn't close. So what makes the point unconvincing (not ridiculous) is that there weren't very many QB run plays called... and according to Jones he doesn't want a bunch. Jones has also said that he wants a QB that is a good decision maker and who distributes the ball to playmakers.
Both guys were tested by that same standard.
I don't think it is something you say when you have a QB race going on... but QD's decision making was miles ahead. He had a hot hand but I wouldn't expect him to be that accurate all the time. If he is... Katie bar the door! But he didn't appear to make many if any bad decisions. That's HUGE.
1. When I say you are taking my words out of context, I mean that you are misinterpreting my intent. Maybe that's due to poor wording on my part. I never meant to insinuate that Jones is purposely trying to skew the competition to benefit Dormady in some tinfoil hat conspiracy. My point was that I think Butch, in his heart, probably hopes QD wins the job because he has 2 seasons and 3 springs of on the job training now, and there is a certain level of trust built up with Jones in that experience. Obviously, someone as calculated as CBJ would never publicly say that, or even insinuate it, but his tendency to reward/defer to upperclassmen looms large and he would find it hard to fully trust a rFR going into the Swanp in September if he had a nearly equal option who was a Junior.
2. The format of the game (the touch rule) took away the run from the QBs, which is why none were called. It's pointless to call run designed run plays if you have to whistle the QB down upon contact. S. Jones kept on one option play and was almost immediately whistled down. That seems to be a bigger part of JG's skill-set than Dormady's. So, to basically eliminate that part of the game, and essentially force both to be primarily pocket passers benefits QD, IMO. Sure, Dormady got outside of the pocket and avoided the rush and made some great throws on the run in the process, but I'm talking about designed QB runs. So, yes, both guys were tested by the same standard, but that standard limited one player more than the other. Similarly, if two basketball players, one a 6-8 PF, the other a 6-0 SG, are playing 1 on 1, and are told that they can't shoot the ball from outside of the paint, who does that benefit? Same standard, but one player's skills (outside shooting) are negated.
Bottom line, QD outplayed Guarantano, and looked effortless doing it. I just wonder how much more effectively JG could have moved the offense if he were allowed to use more of the designed running plays from the playbook. It may have made no difference, or it may have made a ton of difference. We won't really know until the real games start. If Jones wants to limit the number of designed QB runs, then Dormady is his man this year IMO. He looked much more ready to lead this offense as a pocket passer, which, with his edge in experience is to be expected. JG is still learning and will likely be a fine QB in his own time.
I'm not looking to make this a snarky back and forth encounter, and I apologize if my original wording was not clear. I've made my opinion known, and so have you, and hopefully I've made my point more clear.