I agree 100%.
Many Vol fans and the national media are evaluating Butch by the standards of our late 1990s success. He's a "failure" because he hasn't won an SEC Championship or gone 10-2 in his four seasons.
Yet, realistically speaking, Butch has had a grand total of TWO seasons where he was competitive talent-wise in the SEC. His record in those two seasons is 18-8. It's not spectacular, but it's also well above-average.
The 2013 and 2014 teams would not have fared well regardless of coach. The 2013 team was devoid of talent in the skilled positions and had no depth on defense. The 2014 team had one of the weakest O-lines in UT history; and also an extreme lack of depth; and all of this was a result of Dooley's incompetence. Not even Nick Saban could've made the '13 and '14 teams competitive in the SEC. Yet the Butch naysayers constantly cite losses from those two years as proof that Butch is terrible.
To evaluate Butch, you have to consider where we were in 2012 and what the blueprint should have been to succeed. In two short years, he restocked the roster and had us competitive talent-wise in the SEC. He's had some of the most difficult schedules in the nation and has held up OK.
The frustrating part is that Butch has made us very good again, but not great. 9-4 is not awful, but we should've never lost to South Carolina and Vandy last season. However, our defense was decimated by injuries, and that obviously impacted us at the end of the season. Nevertheless, coaching and conditioning were at least part of the problem. Butch has attempted to address those issues in the offseason.
I've said this all along: I don't know if Butch will take us to the Promised Land, but he's done enough to earn another couple of seasons. He has a lot of similarties with Dabo Swinney, who also had some early struggles, before tweaking his coaching staff in Year 4 and Year 5. Now Dabo has a national championship.
Butch is a good coach. The only question is whether he's a great coach and that's yet to be answered.