I am not saying he is not good, because he is a good ball player.
Most interception are poorly thrown balls, wrong routes & tipped passes.
This is my opinion. Just look at how many great d-backs have just a few interceptions, does this mean they are bad or not being thrown at.
I disagree with you. CBs and Ss tend to be fast, anticipative, position strategists, and often athletic.
Back in 1971 the Vols secondary good. Opposing coaches were saying when you threw the ball Tennessee had as much a chance of getting it as the receivers. Further likes of Lem Barney, Ronnie Lott, Deion Sanders, and Willie Brown are indicative of the very type of tendencies I speak of.
One reason teams including our Vols, favor big, tall, and stronger receivers is they often must fight the defender for position and the ball. Even the skinny Hunter literally wrestled the ball from an Oregon defender two years ago. An elite quarterback can "thread" passes because he has to except when a receiver manages true separation from the defender.
Now, in Amerson's case from what few video clips I've bothered to watch, he is unique. Somewhat like our 1971 Vols CBs and Ss. You throw the ball and he becomes a receiver more than a defender. He certainly has good hands and can jump.
Now, I agree when our posters question the quality of QBs and receivers he's gone up against. But I'm also respect his play. Some of the most dangerous pass defenders have come from "little" schools, littler than NCSU as a matter of fact. Grambling State comes to mind.
===We falsely attribute to men a determined character - putting together all their yesterdays - and averaging them - we presume we know them.===
---------------------------Henry David Thoreau