Amateur Hour Continues

#4,626
#4,626
luthervol said:
Behold: The masterdebater.

You really crack me up sometimes......in a really pitiful kind of way.
Click to expand...

Like I said, keep doing you. I've been rereading the classics. I thought of you and decided to test Aristotle's statement (see below). The test started yesterday. Notice I called my shot and you proved it perfectly. lol

before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.

Aristotle from his work Rhetoric
Click to expand...

His theory was that some people can think rationally and some can't. When you speak rationally to them, they can't even conceive of it. So Aristotle lists this as one valid reason to engage in rhetoric, to communicate with those who are incapable of logic. I've noticed that about you. You've proven it again yesterday and tonight. Thank you for that.

(That was the repeated logical criticisms of your arguments and questions asking you to defend them that you kept ignoring and claiming didn't exist.)

You try to talk logic and rationality. You've tried many times. Every time you do, you show that it's alien to you. Any time anyone tries to engage you with it, you do just what I said you would. You do whatever you have to to deny and divert attention... lie, equivocate, move goalposts... But at the end, it's always rhetoric. You just always have to hide behind vague insults that nfer your intellectual superiority without actually having ever shown any intellectualism at all. lol

So, again... You keep doing you. You never let us down.

Thanks again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, AirVol, Orangeslice13 and 1 other person
#4,627
#4,627
I'm glad you're finally exploring the concepts of rationality and logic. Who knows, you may yet see grey and then maybe even color.
And you'll be blown away once you experience that third dimension.

As I remember yesterday, you were unable to articulate even one specific question when asked. You reposted some series of nonsense from which neither you nor your fellow poster could pull a coherent question.
 
#4,628
#4,628
luthervol said:
I think you may spend more of your day worrying about the people that recognize Trump for the despicable human that he is, than they spend worrying about Trump. Recognizing Trump for what he is does not equate to obsession. Refusing to recognize what Trump is seems to be the more obsessive undertaking.
Click to expand...
Pissing in your pants right now?..... again?
 
#4,629
#4,629
luthervol said:
I'm glad you're finally exploring the concepts of rationality and logic. Who knows, you may yet see grey and then maybe even color.
And you'll be blown away once you experience that third dimension.

As I remember yesterday, you were unable to articulate even one specific question when asked. You reposted some series of nonsense from which neither you nor your fellow poster could pull a coherent question.
Click to expand...

You should reread the thread, Soupy. There were a series of criticisms, with at least one question attached to each, asking for your specific feedback and answers. But you weren't interested in much more than your standard fare.

Thanks again for proving my tests out. You went from useless social justice warrior to useful social experiment.

Toodles.
 
#4,631
#4,631
Orange_Crush said:
No. I've been giving lots of consideration as to how to have discussions with people who either refuse to use logic or can't use logic, and show an ability to only use emotional rhetoric in discussions.

I've had enough go rounds with Luther to know that he refuses logic, he lies, moves goal-posts, lies more, ignores logic, lies more, and always argues from emotional rhetoric. So I figure I'll use logic for the sake of the audience and speak rhetoric for his benefit.
Click to expand...
He's a case study in head trauma induced socialistic idiocy complicated by TDS
 
#4,632
#4,632
Carl Pickens said:
He's a case study in head trauma induced socialistic idiocy complicated by TDS
Click to expand...
That quote was actually signaling Luther as to the test he was participating in. I predicted his results in the test. He still checked every box. It was actually almost breathtaking in how correct Aristotle proved to be.
 
#4,634
#4,634
Orange_Crush said:
You should reread the thread, Soupy. There were a series of criticisms, with at least one question attached to each, asking for your specific feedback and answers. But you weren't interested in much more than your standard fare.

Thanks again for proving my tests out. You went from useless social justice warrior to useful social experiment.

Toodles.
Click to expand...
Still refusing? Or just unable? What's so hard about picking a question? I think we all know.
 
#4,635
#4,635
luthervol said:
Still refusing? Or just unable? What's so hard about picking a question? I think we all know.
Click to expand...
Soupy, i quoted the questions to you fohr times. This is more of the intellectual dishonesty i predicted. Stop acting like it's me. You're projecting.

Listen, I'm no longer in front of a keyboard. It's no longer convenient to mock you, and i got what i expcted. I'm done with you until you're willing to go back and answer the questions i posed, yet you repeatedly claimed weren't asked.

Thanks again for doing you with such perfection.
 
#4,636
#4,636
1972 Grad said:
Created a business friendly environment by rolling back some regulations. Created a better environment for producing cheaper energy in this country. Tax cuts.
Click to expand...

Any of the main Republicans would have signed that tax bill and rolled back regulations.
 
#4,637
#4,637
Orange_Crush said:
Soupy, i quoted the questions to you fohr times. This is more of the intellectual dishonesty i predicted. Stop acting like it's me. You're projecting.

Listen, I'm no longer in front of a keyboard. It's no longer convenient to mock you, and i got what i expcted. I'm done with you until you're willing to go back and answer the questions i posed, yet you repeatedly claimed weren't asked.

Thanks again for doing you with such perfection.
Click to expand...
We've once again reached the proverbial impasse. You can't pull out a single coherent question from your own blathering post and then attempt to twist your defeat into some type of victory. I think it was Socrates who said, "it's a simple mind who insists on his own set of rules"; or maybe that was Captain Kangaroo.
 
#4,638
#4,638
Orange_Crush said:
Soupy, i quoted the questions to you fohr times. This is more of the intellectual dishonesty i predicted. Stop acting like it's me. You're projecting.

Listen, I'm no longer in front of a keyboard. It's no longer convenient to mock you, and i got what i expcted. I'm done with you until you're willing to go back and answer the questions i posed, yet you repeatedly claimed weren't asked.

Thanks again for doing you with such perfection.
Click to expand...
@luthervol
 
#4,639
#4,639
Orange_Crush said:
No. I've been giving lots of consideration as to how to have discussions with people who either refuse to use logic or can't use logic, and show an ability to only use emotional rhetoric in discussions.

I've had enough go rounds with Luther to know that he refuses logic, he lies, moves goal-posts, lies more, ignores logic, lies more, and always argues from emotional rhetoric. So I figure I'll use logic for the sake of the audience and speak rhetoric for his benefit.
Click to expand...
...
 
#4,642
#4,642
Carl Pickens said:
He's a case study in head trauma induced socialistic idiocy complicated by TDS
Click to expand...

He did say that the economy is not of top importance and gas prices are #135 (I think, don’t wish to misrepresent) on his list.

Common ground doesn’t exist between me and someone with those beliefs as they have no clue how the world works
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
#4,647
#4,647
Orangeslice13 said:
He did say that the economy is not of top importance and gas prices are #135 (I think, don’t wish to misrepresent) on his list.

Common ground doesn’t exist between me and someone with those beliefs as they have no clue how the world works
Click to expand...
He's a parasite latched on the government teet..... was a Bernie supporter.... yet doesn't think Hillary and the DNC rigged the primary against him.... in short.... he's an idiot
 
#4,649
#4,649
evillawyer said:
GOP just revealing how anti-democratic they really are. Can't gerrymander the state primaries, so this is the next best thing I guess.

South Carolina GOP could scrap 2020 primary to protect Trump
Click to expand...

Didn't even have to read the link to know that the Repubs are sleezy swamp rats.

What do you recommend? Do you believe the Democrats are awesome, so we need to trust a one-party government to them? Do you believe they're corrupt, so let's just continue business as usual? Do you believe changes to the party system are needed but impossible? Unneeded? Needed but possible? If so, how do we fix it?

Or will you and the clones for the Republicans just keep serving your reptilian overlords while complaining about the shade of the scales on the other side?
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top