I mean, if you want to find the most highly publicized and egregious example of the justice system from the past 25 years, and compare it to what amounts to a weak accusation against a virtually unknown athlete, then there's very little to be discussed here. In fact, this is a straw man argument of the highest order, and the two instances have literally zero to do with one another.
That's like me saying, "people get convicted and sentenced to death, but are later exonerated by DNA evidence, so it's obvious that Beasley was falsely accused." Give me a break, dude.