BearCat204
Second Chances
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 67,998
- Likes
- 45,991
How much of a pay cut request is moral? When does it become immoral on the part of the requester? No moral code is established beyond discussion. Your personal one may be, but there is not a universal moral code. The polar ends can likely be agreed upon by most, but there is a lot of room for discussion in the middle.I don’t. Moral conduct is already established. I’m just holding the standard.
Who cares, they signed a contract. Well within their right to reject paycuts. Not their fault NCAA, the Schools, and their Presidents want to put restrictions on the season. To add, are the schools taking less money from their ESPN contracts. Should the schools take a cut from that big money? Schools can't have it both ways.Tennessee football: 8 assistants reject pay cuts. Martin, Graham accept
- Offensive coordinator Jim Chaney
- Defensive coordinator Derrick Ansley
- Offensive line coach Will Friend
- Quarterbacks coach Chris Weinke
- Inside linebackers coach Brian Niedermeyer
- Outside linebackers coach Shelton Felton
- Tight ends coach Joe Osovet
- Strength and conditioning coach A.J. Artis
How much of a pay cut request is moral? When does it become immoral on the part of the requester? No moral code is established beyond discussion. Your personal one may be, but there is not a universal moral code. The polar ends can likely be agreed upon by most, but there is a lot of room for discussion in the middle.
How much of a pay cut request is moral? When does it become immoral on the part of the requester? No moral code is established beyond discussion. Your personal one may be, but there is not a universal moral code. The polar ends can likely be agreed upon by most, but there is a lot of room for discussion in the middle.
True. Would have maximized your comprehension and retention of the point.
Ayn Rand idolatry runs deep with this one.
One last try, and I give up with you. Your choice of the word "moral" is the problem here. Let me validate your feelings. Something unsavory, tone deaf, non-generous, icky, or whatever term you'd like to utilize occurred in this situation. That is what you are feeling. Nothing lacking morals occurred here. Two parties entered a contract. One party asked the other to amend the contract. The second party declined. Nothing immoral occurred here. You can define their lack of generous spirit and human decency however you'd like on whatever scale you'd like. In the end, however, it is not and has not been immoral in any way. I'm sorry you can't separate those concepts. It's likely from your overwhelming goodness, but they are separate concepts at play here.Sure, right. I honestly feel pity for your lack of reason here. I’m confident you’ve made zero sacrifices this year. There’s no way you could have made mandatory or voluntary sacrifices in 2020 and still have this perspective on things.
One final example: contract execution is not a moral issue as long as either party does not lie, cheat, or steal in execution of that contract. That's not at play here. You are implementing moral compass in much too broad of a stroke. I believe in moral compass, but there are benign situations where it takes discernment to decipher the moral issue, as well as there being issues that don't really matter towards morality.It’s beyond my ability to understand his type of rational. I’m guided by a moral compass that, inherently, has a true North. When you allow the outside magnetic forces to influence your heart and ethics then that’s when you have morals and ethics that fluctuate and sway like some of the unfortunate self-proclaimed “Superior intellectual” people on here.
One last try, and I give up with you. Your choice of the word "moral" is the problem here. Let me validate your feelings. Something unsavory, tone deaf, non-generous, icky, or whatever term you'd like to utilize occurred in this situation. That is what you are feeling. Nothing lacking morals occurred here. Two parties entered a contract. One party asked the other to amend the contract. The second party declined. Nothing immoral occurred here. You can define their lack of generous spirit and human decency however you'd like on whatever scale you'd like. In the end, however, it is not and has not been immoral in any way. I'm sorry you can't separate those concepts. It's likely from your overwhelming goodness, but they are separate concepts at play here.