TENNaciousUTfan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Messages
- 2,631
- Likes
- 0
Petty...yes. Boyd, no. We could've pulled M.Brown and Orson Charles if we had kept Boyd. Not having a marquee QB on the roster or commit list is just too much for a WR to overlook.Did you think that about Bryce Petty or Tahj Boyd after we let them go?
Plus, the staff tried to get back in with Boyd after he won the Army All-American Bowl Co-MVP on offense, but it's impossible to cross a bridge after you've burned it. Letting Boyd go was the 1st major cock-up by CLK, and one I bet he's wishing he could re-do...at least from a depth perspective. Everybody was trying to downplay his move on Boyd, and I remember telling friends, just wait til the AA Bowl, and you'll see he ain't nobody's punk. That's EXACTLY what happened...he showed out.
People here are still largely in denial, but in a year or so, when he's tearing it up at Clemson, I wonder what kind of excuses people will come up with.
"Well, his knee was injured." Wrong!!! If Jesse hurts his knee this fall, are we going to toss a commitment from him too? HELL NO!!!
"Well, he just doesn't FIT our system." Wrong, again!!! He is no different, fit-wise, than Scroggins, Brunetti or 90% of the other prospects out there, who play in quasi-spread style offenses.
Stop it with the stupid excuses, already. Why is it so hard to accept that our new HC made a rash, implusive decision before he had all of his staff in place? We've all made decisions we wish we could take back, and this is one of them I bet CLK desperately wishes he had back.
Boyd is easily...easily as good a prospect as Lamaison and most of the other prospects we've offered since (Munchie, Brunetti, etc).
Kiffin was probably supremely confident that he'd land a Barkely type of commitment in this class. We'll see if that is the case.
Last edited:

