HSVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,371
- Likes
- 85
You know, hedging isn't a bad thing. I mean, who doesn't hedge in their life? You'd be crazy to treat most information as absolute.
Things change, and they can change quickly. What a lot of people don't understand is that most information, especially information dependent upon multiple major influences, is perishable and has an expiration date. When you're talking about situations that involve millionaires/billionaires, a state institution, and a football program with as much national attention as Tennessee, there are a lot of outside influences. If you DON'T hedge your position or consider that other alternatives existence, you're going to look like a complete fool.
Larry never looks like a complete fool. A lot of other posters on here do.
So, the moral of the story is this: Hedging is, generally speaking, a good thing. Not just on a message board, but in life. More people need to understand this.
Sorry for the lecture, but I just find it fascinating that a guy that rarely turns out to be wrong, is criticized for acting like his information isn't absolute.
Something people need to realize is that "calling" stuff or being 100% correct all the time about things is unrealistic and impossible no matter connections.
Dave Hart could go around telling anyone that will listen Dooley is on the next train out Sunday after Kentucky. If he wakes up that morning and has a change of heart...No one can predict that.
Even conflicting info can be good info. It depends what side of this whole mess people are getting it from: ad, boosters, maybe people in the biz or close to other coaches may all have different perspectives. It indicates things havent been ironed out completely or that one side is having information withheld.
If there is some need of secrecy (come on gruden...) its not really surprising people in the ad wouldent be privy to whats up just like in other situations they would be the first to know (silent commits for instance).
All I know is that if I wanted Alabama coaches Id start screwing my sister and go cheer for Alabama.
I'm with you on wanting Gruden to happen. Paying a head coach an additional $3M to $4M a year pales in comparison to the money UT would benefit from making such a hire. We would make up the difference in a couple non-conference games via ticket sales and concessions. It's just simple math.
You mean to tell me that if you moved a big east team into the SEC, Pac12, or Big 12 that they would lose a lot of games? Well no sh!t sherlock, the top players are not going to want to play in the big east no matter who the coach is, as long as you are recruiting at the top of your conference you can't expect much more. For example Cincinnati during the Brian Kelly years would have lost a ton of games in the SEC, as evident by the trouncing they received from Florida. I never tried to argue that he has not beaten a team of any consequence, but it is also not an arguable point that he has not had the opportunity to get a win of any consequence. His only opportunity against a team from the top 25 was West Virginia and he won. I also never said that he didn't have any control over scheduling. Could he have scheduled tougher opponents? Yes, but that is a completely irrelevant point.
The problem is that UT will make the money. Not the men throwing down the "investment". For the big three it is not a financial investment. It is paying a large amount of money to enjoy their fall again. Heck if I had a billion I would probably try to by happieness. Who would not?
Reading isn't your strong suit is it? I specifically said that the coach does play a role in scheduling, but it is a completely irrelevant point in this discussiom
Posted via VolNation Mobile
If he hasnt played and beaten anyone then he hasnt rebuilt the program...period
he currently has the 73rd class in the country so certainly not sold that he is an elite recruiter - averaging in the mid30's before this year is not elite
I am just not sure why I am supposed to be excited about this guy - he has proven absolutely nothing at Lville and his recruiting is mediocre
He is recruiting against Ohio st, Michigan and the whole SEC. How many elite recruits do you really think anyone could pull to Lville??
He is the best recruiter of south FL in the country maybe, and it showed when he was at FL.
If anything point to his coaching ability he has mediocre players and has them what 8-1?
His defenses were great at UF and he recruited most of the defensive players there.
Strong would be a great hire and they are many others who would agree with this