Iran

#9,353
#9,353
kiddiedoc said:
So you are advocating for boots on the ground over air strikes, which have zero risk of US troop casualties?
Click to expand...
No. Are you wordsmithing. Airstrikes have their consequences and does have risks as well. There are many consequences that can and possibly result in Trump's action.
Have you verified the intel and assuming it is accurate. If it is this was not the way to address it.

This is simply a Trump diversion and a distraction which has put already put Forces at risks in the region and other places. Iraq was a cake walk, Iran will not be.

Again convert ops could have accomplished the same goal with less risk. Instead we have an incompetent War Department being used by idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sonofUT62
#9,355
#9,355
joevol24 said:
Make an actual point, not a blowhard statement for likes. Learn things, don't parrot anything. I already said I don't agree with the action, but Trump is well within his constitutional powers. Quit adding to the dumbing down of America to prove you know absolutely nothing about the Constitution. People like you are the problem, have been for my whole life. Educate yourself before parroting a party point
Click to expand...
It sounds like you know less about the Constitution than your correspondent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11, BernardKingGOAT, DuckInAPen and 1 other person
#9,361
#9,361
Sudden Impact said:
You know what assume means I am sure.

Did I say without using weapons? No, I did not.

Other methods available....convert operations. Lower risk---with less commitment and use of US forces.

You don't have to go full blown showmanship to accomplish/fulfill the same End state.
Trump has to have a I love me event.

Less risk without full blown combat.

Some think this is a video game. Wag the dog Trump's new Vietnam expect more lies and weapons of mass destruction.
Click to expand...

Yes, you actually did say “without weapons”.

Sudden Impact said:
Trump's Barnum & Bailey show. So many ways to take Iran out without using weapons.
Trump has his finger on the Nuke football and turning America into another season of Trump's Apprentice.

So many different ways to accomplish this task without all the bells and whistles.
Click to expand...

So how? Even covert operations would require weapons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SquirrelOrange3
#9,362
#9,362
VAVol85 said:
Because they are human beings. Not arguing that war is the best way to help their situation, but why would you not hope that Iranians situation in life could be improved.
Click to expand...

How about this?...instead of spending lots of money and wasting the youth, lives, and mental health of our military to try to save people from a horrible regime, how about we just stop directly supporting other horrible regimes?

We'd do more good with less effort than we're currently expending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and SquirrelOrange3
#9,364
#9,364
n_huffhines said:
How about this?...instead of spending lots of money and wasting the youth, lives, and mental health of our military to try to save people from a horrible regime, how about we just stop directly supporting other horrible regimes?

We'd do more good with less effort than we're currently expending.
Click to expand...
Bc doing the right thing would make them less money. We both know that’s all that matters to these psychopaths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SquirrelOrange3
#9,365
#9,365
I don’t fear Iran’s ability to inflict military pain on the US. I do fear radical Islamic cells may have been established inside the US during the Biden open border policies and they will attempt multiple terror strikes against American citizen targets. Hopefully I’m just paranoid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards
#9,370
#9,370
BeardedVol said:
Interesting.
View attachment 816957
Click to expand...
Read the damn discussion. @MAD said he cared about the Iranian people. Someone else asked why we should care and I offered the quote you responded to, “because they are human”. I don’t mind debating but don’t appreciate your taking something totally out of context. My quote was not advocating war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAD and Rickyvol77
#9,373
#9,373
hog88 said:
Yes, you actually did say “without weapons”.



So how? Even covert operations would require weapons.
Click to expand...
Your major point, thanks for pointing out a minor detail. My point is the mission can be accomplished covertly with less Forces and much less risks not only for the forces but Americans abroad. Bottom line: Walk quietly and carry a big Stick.

It makes no difference at this point, Trump's sideshow and overuse of force is a diversion to more election fraud or an attempt to cancel the elections. He probably has his finger on a nuke at this moment and will attempt to spin this mess of which was all created by Trump.

He is in hot water and knows it. He wants body bags so that America rallies to him. Distraction to Epstein files and the fact he is losing support.

Hail Mary pass. Desperate People take desperate actions. Trump is desperately trying to save his Presidency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
#9,374
#9,374
n_huffhines said:
How about this?...instead of spending lots of money and wasting the youth, lives, and mental health of our military to try to save people from a horrible regime, how about we just stop directly supporting other horrible regimes?

We'd do more good with less effort than we're currently expending.
Click to expand...
How about this…screw you. I did not advocate for war, I responded to a question that asked why should we care about the people of Iran. I have friends who are Iranian immigrants and I care what happens to the people of Iran. Whether that means advocating war was not the question on the table.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top