I can totally understand you wanting to cancel a series with UConn. However, I’m going to dispute your argument about playing in February has always favored UConn. It was clearly done for TV viewership reasons, exposure for women’s basketball, and financial reasons.
Of course, you have already stated you do not like a different opinion and in fact, even refuses to read anything which is different than what you already believe. (I think your quote was, “blah blah blah I am not even gonna read that.”) However, this is for anyone else who might read the post, and are more objectively open-minded.
Currently, the big East is extremely weak, no question, even UConn fans are unhappy with that. However, your statement said, “has always favored UConn.” Between 2006 and 2019 they did not play each other, and during this period were arguably some of UConn‘s strongest teams and arguably some of Tennessee’s weakest teams, (although they did win two championships). Prior to 2006 the big east was an extremely strong conference, and included teams, like Notre Dame, Louisville, Rutgers, and West Virginia.
Here is a breakdown of the teams that made the NCAA tournament and the winning percentage during the tournament. As an objective person can see, the Big East held their own as a top conference during those years. In fact, based on winning percentage, the big east outperformed the SEC each and every one of those years, except for 2008 thanks to Tennessee’s 6-O record.
Therefore, to sum it up. While the big East is weak now that has not always been the case, and Tennessee agreed to play in February for the same reason Connecticut agreed to play in February, because when you are a winning university with a winning mentality, you do not look for lame excuses. If anything, playing a tough schedule prepares you for tough midseason games as opposed to a week schedule, which doesn’t prepare you for tough games. I believe that is the argument that people used why LSU struggled in their first tough game. Winning 40 point games is actually counterproductive.
Year: BE % SEC %
2008 8 .636 5 .765
2009 7 .714 7 .462
2010 7 .647 6 .647
2011 9 .679 4 .600
2012 8 .652 8 .600
2013 8 .696 7 .667