Majors
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 21,214
- Likes
- 35,333
It is quite surprising how sensitive MAGA has suddenly become on this issue.
Yep, got rid of. Anymore brain busters for me.Neither @SpaceCoastVol or @Majors will ever acknowledge this tweet from former Republican House Rep. Matt Gaetz, which was posted just 2 days ago.
.... and let's not forget that Matt Gaetz was Donald Trump's first choice to be Attorney General.
It is quite surprising how sensitive MAGA has suddenly become on this issue.
Real talk!Any of those mentioned had multiple attempts on their lives?
What do you all think “86” would mean when it’s associated with an ex-FBI Director?
Enough.
Keep on diverting/lying lIke the D Party and the press has done for the last 10 years. Let’s see where that takes you all.
Until people in your party say enough, you will get what you deserve.
I guess you’ve never read any of James Lee Burke’s novels.All threats of violence against the President are looked into by the Secret Service. The issue here is whether or not what James Comey posted constituted a violent threat. When used as a verb, the number "86" does not have to involve an act of violence.
In an episode of Cheers from 1987, Rebecca Howe (Kirstie Alley) tells Woody Boyd (Woody Harrelson) to "86" the ferns. She was telling him to throw away the plant decorations. I'm not sure I've ever heard it used as a threat of violence against a person. It's a silly thing to get your panties in a twist over.
Thank you for the crocodile tears, but they are unnecessary.Any of those mentioned had multiple attempts on their lives?
What do you all think “86” would mean when it’s associated with an ex-FBI Director?
Enough.
Keep on diverting/lying lIke the D Party and the press has done for the last 10 years. Let’s see where that takes you all.
Until people in your party say enough, you will get what you deserve.
Are you some kind of crazy partisan junk poster? Completely oblivious? Or dragging out an unfunny joke? I don't get it.
You know about Clinton, Gore, Obama, Hillary, and Biden meeting with the Saudis, right?
View attachment 742680
threats against federal officials are crimes.....investigation is required....If you think an instagram seashell post is a threat, then it's safe to assume you live in a state of fear that could easily be considered irrational.
threats against federal officials are crimes.....investigation is required....
grok:
"Threats against federal officials are a crime under U.S. law. Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 115 makes it illegal to threaten to assault, kidnap, or murder a federal official, their immediate family, or someone under their protection with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with their official duties, or in retaliation for performing those duties. This applies to a wide range of federal officials, including members of Congress, judges, and law enforcement officers.
Additionally, other statutes may apply depending on the context, such as 18 U.S.C. § 871 for threats against the President or Vice President, or 18 U.S.C. § 875 for interstate communications containing threats. Penalties can include fines, imprisonment (up to 7 years for threats under § 115), or both, depending on the severity and nature of the threat."
You in a nutshell.threats against federal officials are crimes.....investigation is required....
grok:
"Threats against federal officials are a crime under U.S. law. Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 115 makes it illegal to threaten to assault, kidnap, or murder a federal official, their immediate family, or someone under their protection with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with their official duties, or in retaliation for performing those duties. This applies to a wide range of federal officials, including members of Congress, judges, and law enforcement officers.
Additionally, other statutes may apply depending on the context, such as 18 U.S.C. § 871 for threats against the President or Vice President, or 18 U.S.C. § 875 for interstate communications containing threats. Penalties can include fines, imprisonment (up to 7 years for threats under § 115), or both, depending on the severity and nature of the threat."