McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 63,531
- Likes
- 139,037
Understood. I think we can see where we got crossed up. For you, the convo was about NORAD and for me it was more all encompassing.60/40 is the cost split of NORAD. My understanding of the convo is we were talking about whether or not they are an "ungrateful dependent." The supposed inequity of NORAD seems to be the only understandable (to me) reason* one might consider them a dependent. Maybe you weren't talking about NORAD at all.
*somebody mentioned their dependence on our trade, but we're dependent on it too. Trade is not a zero sum game, and we are not a dependent even if we are dependent, and the same goes for them.
happy to continue to discuss if needed.


