PowerT83
Somewhat sober
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 7,049
- Likes
- 701
fixed your post. Textbook example of the most common volnation fallacy, which is completely rewording someone else’s post to make to try to win an argumentIt's wholly based on his authority, your entire argument is predicated on "Josh Heupel is an ex heisman winning player and a football coach, who sees the players practice day in and day out, coaches the players, is installing Josh Heupel’s offensive system, does film study on the oponentes, therefore Josh Huepel is therefore correct about which qb he feels gives the Tennessee team the best chance to win; textbook example of the fallacy really.
fixed your post. Textbook example of the most common volnation fallacy, which is completely rewording someone else’s post to make to try to win an argument
Great, please make an actual argument as to why Heupel isn’t the authority on Josh Heupels system, instead of just attacking my argument.There you go again, making yourself look worse.
Listing more of his credentials as a response to an argument, instead of actually refuting the argument, only reaffirms your use of a the 'appeal to authority' fallacy.
If Hooker isn't getting first team reps to get his timing down with his receivers, he's going to be at a disadvantage come game time when he gets tossed in. That's why continuing the Milton project, and giving him those first team practice reps all week, only for him to still be Joe Milton, is detrimental to Hooker when he's got to go in and try to play cleanup.
Hell, it's why bringing Milton into the program in the first place is overall detrimental to the QB room as a whole. How much time and effort have been, and are still being expended to try and fix Milton's issues that he's had since high school, and 3 years at Michigan couldn't fix?
It's really a new issue.Since Peyton; maybe? And Casey Clausen. Well, I'm leaving Dobbs out, and He was great too. But few and Far between.
Great, please make an actual argument as to why Heupel isn’t the authority on Josh Heupels system, instead of just attacking my argument.
It's really a new issue.
Before the JG debacle we had
Dobbs
Bray
Crompton for a year
Ainge
Clausen
Tee
Peyton
Shuler
Kelly etc
The past few years have been an exception to the norm. It has never really been this bad! And I think right now it feels worse and more dire than it is because of the JG years.
Just admit you hated the JH hire and want this thing to blow up so you can pi$$ and moan about it for eternity.
Here’s an idea - let Heupel do whatever the F he wants at QB for more than 8 quarters without hyperventilating about it.
yeah but this isn't his first season is the issue.Does anybody remember the wild stallion from Wyoming, Josh Allen? You know the starting QB for the Buffalo Bills. He was much like Milton, 6'5 with a cannon of an arm but a low completion percentage throughout his college career. Milton still has too much upside to not start him against Tenn Tech. I don't know if he's fixable within 1 season, but let's give it a little more time.
Here we go again, the coach is always right, even when he's wrong, and any criticism is "hate".
Feels like Dooley/Butch/Pruitt era all over again; I do so love nostalgia.
That's the point, Josh was just as in-accurate and he is a starting QB in the NFL. Do you think Milton isn't capable of similar stats if he can get a full (healthy) season under his belt? The comparison was also stature and intangibles. I would guess Milton runs a 4.7 and can throw just as far/hard.Completion percentage is the only similarity between those two from a production standpoint.
![]()
![]()
Here we go again, straw man logic to make BS claims
