Amateur Hour Continues

#37,229
#37,229
evillawyer said:
Hilarious. Don't know how any of you goobers can support this asshat.

Click to expand...
Why? Because he’s not going to continue to take campaign money from PAC’s? That’s what is wrong with this country now. Every politician owes their soul to these corporations, unions, and special interests groups due to PAC money. So they screw over the average Joe to take care of their donors. None of the care about the people they’re suppose to represent. The only goober and asshat in here is you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF
#37,233
#37,233
Velo Vol said:
I think the Court will be right on this after it overturns the election.

Click to expand...

What’s more amateur hourish is the “board” upholding the ban while acknowledging there wasn’t a basis to do so and FaceBook violated their own rules in imposing it.

It’s almost like.... arbitrary social media censureship on users that they don’t agree with or they dislike is amateur.
 
#37,234
#37,234
Velo Vol said:
I think the Court will be right on this after it overturns the election.

Click to expand...

While we’re at it, can we get them to overturn the development of NBC+, CBS+, ABC+, Disney+, Hulu, Amazon Prime, Paramount+ and any other streaming service after Netflix?
 
#37,238
#37,238
evillawyer said:
Hilarious. Don't know how any of you goobers can support this asshat.

Click to expand...


Just dont understand how anyone can respect Rafael 'Ted' Cruz as a man. Trump called his wife a fat whore and his dad a murderer.

And yet he became trump's biggest sycophant.

what kind of "man" is he....
 
#37,241
#37,241
NorthDallas40 said:
What’s more amateur hourish is the “board” upholding the ban while acknowledging there wasn’t a basis to do so and FaceBook violated their own rules in imposing it.

It’s almost like.... arbitrary social media censureship on users that they don’t agree with or they dislike is amateur.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure they said a suspension was justified but that the rules didn’t allow for it to be indefinite. It either needed to be permanent or for a fixed period.
 
#37,242
#37,242
RockyTop85 said:
Pretty sure they said a suspension was justified but that the rules didn’t allow for it to be indefinite. It either needed to be permanent or for a fixed period.
Click to expand...
So no that isn’t a good take I’d submit. “Justified” is a huge stretch. The board found FB did violate their own policy which was fairly arbitrary to begin with. Since the board found that the policy was violated a better more even handed finding would have been to reverse the ban, have FB clearly restate the expectations, and have all parties acknowledge the expectations. And that would work in FB’s favor because there is no way Trump would follow that process and that would green light FB to be punitive.
 
#37,243
#37,243
E0pRjWUUUAIqCZA
 
#37,244
#37,244
NorthDallas40 said:
So no that isn’t a good take I’d submit. “Justified” is a huge stretch. The board found FB did violate their own policy which was fairly arbitrary to begin with. Since the board found that the policy was violated a better more even handed finding would have been to reverse the ban, have FB clearly restate the expectations, and have all parties acknowledge the expectations. And that would work in FB’s favor because there is no way Trump would follow that process and that would green light FB to be punitive.
Click to expand...
"At the time of Mr. Trump's posts, there was a clear, immediate risk of harm and his words of support for those involved in the riots legitimized their violent actions," the Oversight Board wrote in the announcement of its decision. "Given the seriousness of the violations and the ongoing risk of violence, Facebook was justified in suspending Mr. Trump's accounts."
Facebook Ban On Donald Trump Will Hold, Social Network's Oversight Board Rules
 
#37,245
#37,245
RockyTop85 said:
"At the time of Mr. Trump's posts, there was a clear, immediate risk of harm and his words of support for those involved in the riots legitimized their violent actions," the Oversight Board wrote in the announcement of its decision. "Given the seriousness of the violations and the ongoing risk of violence, Facebook was justified in suspending Mr. Trump's accounts."
Facebook Ban On Donald Trump Will Hold, Social Network's Oversight Board Rules
Click to expand...
Awesome. The shills said they were right so FB was right. Bravo. Here read Turley’s take on it. And just so we’re clear Trump is the Englishman.

Jonathan Turley: Facebook vs. Trump – Big Tech has allowed for the creation of a state media without the state
 
#37,246
#37,246
#37,247
#37,247
RockyTop85 said:
I think the idea that their justification is wholly derived from the approval of this board is completely bonkers.
Click to expand...
And on that we agree. There is no neutrality here on this “oversight board” and it’s this kind of antics that’s going to get their asses put under federal oversight. Which will be even more screwed up as at its base by definition that is pure political.
 
#37,250
#37,250
NorthDallas40 said:
And on that we agree. There is no neutrality here on this “oversight board” and it’s this kind of antics that’s going to get their asses put under federal oversight. Which will be even more screwed up as at its base by definition that is pure political.
Click to expand...
I doubt we agree.

The decision to ban him was obviously justified, regardless of what these “shills” said.

He was cheering on criminal activity that was being carried out in his name over a claim of fraud that he and his campaign made and advanced on their platform without any proof whatsoever.

He should have been permanently removed from the outset and then this board’s decision wouldn’t have been interesting or newsworthy.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top