volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,655
- Likes
- 23,616
This confuses the issue. It has nothing to do with whether the drug works or not. In fact, we all hope it does work. Rather, the criticism is of his placing his own wish that it work above the scientific approach to testing it.
But we get it. If it works, Trumps and his slurpers will proclaim his genius from every street corner and rooftop. If the science says it doesn't work, then there will be a mix of 1) the scientists are just saying that because they hate Trump; and, 2) that's okay he said it might not work, anyway.
These are the basic refrains of the entire Trump administration.
I think that is great. NGV must be pleased to see something good come from the work they all are doing.A bright spot .. two of NGVs Covid positive patients are doing better today one is out from under some very heavy meds and is responding to commands . It’s really amazing . I don’t think he was given much of a chance .
I don't think so, but I am glad to see you have put it out there, TWO WEEKS, if in two weeks we don't see anywhere close to that, I hope you'll man up, if it does-I will. The "new drug" treatments are extremely efficacious. Now, I will add one caveat, if a large group of people, with under lying health issues, such as those taking the AIDS drugs daily start getting infected, then the numbers will really go up-in certain cities.
I think that is great. NGV must be pleased to see something good come from the work they all are doing.
Trump's line of "What do you have to lose? Take it," strikes me as an awkward thing to say. Almost as if he is touting a liquid refreshment. It's my understanding that hydroxychloroquine is not considered safe for people with abnormal heart rhythms.If you can pull yourself above the political BS here is what we know.
Drs were using it before he had ever heard of it.
Drs are continuing to use it because they see positives.
So, Drs didnt put citizens (globally) at risk because Trump was hopeful. Drs havent continue to use because Trump says its showing effective.
The shift from "Trump deserves the fault for this drug" to "Trump doesnt deserve the credit" is noted.
Above the BS line he didnt and doesnt deserve either credit or fault in its continued use by professionals.
I mean, that is what Trump said. I know you'd like for him to have been more reckless and said something like "Go out and take as much of it as you can find, because it works," because that would be easier to criticize, but he didn't.This confuses the issue. It has nothing to do with whether the drug works or not. In fact, we all hope it does work. Rather, the criticism is of his placing his own wish that it work above the scientific approach to testing it.
But we get it. If it works, Trumps and his slurpers will proclaim his genius from every street corner and rooftop. If the science says it doesn't work, then there will be a mix of 1) the scientists are just saying that because they hate Trump; and, 2) that's okay he said it might not work, anyway.
These are the basic refrains of the entire Trump administration.
So for every patient that survives due to being administered Cloroquine can they sue said democrats for trying to block the usage of the drug?
I think it would have pretty reasonable legs since without the drug they would be dead and if said democrats had their way they wouldn't be able to get it.
Trump's line of "What do you have to lose? Take it," strikes me as an awkward thing to say. Almost as if he is touting a liquid refreshment. It's my understanding that hydroxychloroquine is not considered safe for people with abnormal heart rhythms.
Trump's line of "What do you have to lose? Take it," strikes me as an awkward thing to say. Almost as if he is touting a liquid refreshment. It's my understanding that hydroxychloroquine is not considered safe for people with abnormal heart rhythms.
How the hell do you go about proving that with an illness that only has a mortality rate of 3.4% (per the World Health Organization)?So for every patient that survives due to being administered Cloroquine can they sue said democrats for trying to block the usage of the drug?
I think it would have pretty reasonable legs since without the drug they would be dead and if said democrats had their way they wouldn't be able to get it.
This is America. The answer to "can they sue" is always a big fat YES!
Winning that case would be another matter. In your scenario, how would you prove harm in a case where the patient received a successful intervention? Can you prove they would have died otherwise?
No, we need to shut it down until March 13 2038 just to be safeWow we gotta start getting people back to work
Requests to delay mortgage payments jump nearly 2,000% as borrowers seek relief during coronavirus outbreak
You could never prove that. The reality is that the overwhelming majority of people who contract this virus do make a full recovery.The question about suing was for pointing out how ridiculous the statement was that they were going to try to charge Trump with Crimes Against Humanity.
But to that point if a person is on their deathbed and they are declining and a drug is administered then the person not only doesn’t die but returns to a fully healed state.
What caused the person to live? Was it the persons body provided a miraculous turnaround or was it due to the drug? In this scenario I believe you can point to the use of the drug as being the turnaround. Without the drug the person more than likely would have declined into death.