Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

That's what I'm wondering. How long are they going to want to shut everything down? I wouldn't expect only 2 weeks to make a substantial change. Especially since testing is ramping up significantly now so for the next 2 weeks we'll continue to see the numbers gorw, but that should be expected.

I don’t think the temporary shutdown will make a dent in the grand scheme of things. Right now they are just buying time for infrastructure and medical assets to ramp up. Once we feel we are ready, open things back up and let’s face this head on.

At least I hope. If the plan is to simply stay inside and hope it goes away then we are are totally screwed. Eventually we will all get it anyway and die a slow, painful economic death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BennesseeVols
If we hit a worse infection rate than any reported so far, say 750 per million, that is a 0.00075 infection rate.

Now we have .00075 x 300,000,000 (people) = 225,000 infected.

Now of that 225,000 we are saying 20% of cases are very bad.

So 225,000 x .2 = 45,000.

If EVERY bad case results in death (which is absurd) then we have 45,000 deaths.

We are throwing away our world for this.

Someone feel free to destroy my math if you see a mistake. I was rambling this out while working.
Quick, somebody get these numbers to the Veep and everyone can go back to work tomorrow.
 
Everyone should care about the how. Believe me .gov will not forget what we let them get away with because of fear.
Agreed. The "do anything" mentality is extremely dangerous and will likely lead to undesirable effects in the years to come.

Spending, economic repercussions, and govt power grabs concern as much, if not more, than the virus.
 
Even if health officials and government officials 'man up,' do you really think people are going to go back out and spend money?

**** has already hit the fan.
Immediately? No but the quicker we get back to some semblance of normalcy the quicker the economy will recover.

Landfills are freaking closing! Think people going to work and about their normal lives creates a public health risk, wait until trash is pilling up in our city streets.
 
Your comments about their healthcare are complete nonsense. The United States has the worst quality of healthcare of all first world countries. We rank around number 33 Wich is well behind every country with single payer healthcare. If they had our system the problem would have been 100 times worse because people would be too scared to go to the doctor for fear of the cost!
Yep, that’s why there are all those empty emergency rooms. Fear of cost.

Oh wait....
 
  • Like
Reactions: I40flyer and sjt18
If we hit a worse infection rate than any reported so far, say 750 per million, that is a 0.00075 infection rate.

Now we have .00075 x 300,000,000 (people) = 225,000 infected.

Now of that 225,000 we are saying 20% of cases are very bad.

So 225,000 x .2 = 45,000.

If EVERY bad case results in death (which is absurd) then we have 45,000 deaths.

We are throwing away our world for this.

Someone feel free to destroy my math if you see a mistake. I was rambling this out while working.
Your math is correct. To add to it, you are calculating worst case scenarios.
 
Quick, somebody get these numbers to the Veep and everyone can go back to work tomorrow.

And there is the problem. You need affirmation. You need another adult to condone your movement.

Pathetic.

You cant look at numbers and make a reasonable decision on your own.
 
My daughter has been home since last Monday, all classes are online through the end of the semester. This is what I received today from UNC:

Reimbursements
The UNC System has indicated that decisions about refunds for housing and dining fees, which are in their discretion, will be postponed until at least April or until we are beyond the imminent issues facing us with mitigating the spread of the virus. We will not have any additional information to share with you until that time. This also applies to campus-based fees, including parking, and student activities facilities and programs.

Means, "we're going to drag this out as long as we can hoping you will forget". Ya ain't getting ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
If we hit a worse infection rate than any reported so far, say 750 per million, that is a 0.00075 infection rate.

Now we have .00075 x 300,000,000 (people) = 225,000 infected.

Now of that 225,000 we are saying 20% of cases are very bad.

So 225,000 x .2 = 45,000.

If EVERY bad case results in death (which is absurd) then we have 45,000 deaths.

We are throwing away our world for this.

Someone feel free to destroy my math if you see a mistake. I was rambling this out while working.

Yeah, wtf is Trump doing?
 
Not to keep getting off topic, but thought I'd update since a few asked. Surgery for my wife is over, everything went good. Had to cut a little more than expected, but she's good. Thanks for asking, praying, and thinking about her.

Great news, although this is the first I've heard of it. What kind of surgery?
 
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33
Still think a targeted, strict, quarantine to the at risk population AND their caregivers is the better approach. Worst case scenario would be probably the same number of deaths in the at risk community, and a bunch of young healthy people maybe getting sick, maybe showing symptoms and the economy survives.
 
Are students getting a pro-rated refund for housing and meal plans?
McDaughter's college will be issuing refunds, reductions to tuition payments, and credits to offset no housing and no food. I was surprised to hear it.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top