drvenner
Home Sweet Home
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 41,007
- Likes
- 160,544
It might actually help sort out the "blue blood" mentality a bit.
QB A. can get bagman money to go to Alabama...may never see the field, and only got that money to sign. But If QB A is more interested in being "the guy" and playing ball he can now essentially make money anywhere, and being 3rd string for Bama simply won't pay him as well as being the starting QB at say, NC State.
Most of the recruiting imbalance exist because the winning schools are making the most money and investing it back into the program. But the players aren't exactly being handed that money. They get better exposure to be "noticed" by NFL scouts though if they are at a school that is constantly winning. You give them the opportunity to make some coin just from their own likeness and popularity, well North Dakota State isn't such a bad deal anymore...
At least now they can make good money locally and aren't buried on a roster somewhere competing for a chance to get into the NFL. If anything it might help "school pride" deciding to stay home and build local business connections that will last you far longer than the sport will in the grand scheme of things.
If you don't think there is a difference in professional football versus college football, I really don't know how to respond. To me it is night and day different and I think a lot of that has to do with amateurism vs professional.Interesting.
To each his own, but I don’t think college football players are playing for pride. On our level I believe they mostly play for financial interests - whether that be the $50,000 wire transfer that got them to Tennessee or the hope they have of making more money at the professional level. Inevitably “pride” in a school will be established but that isn’t guaranteed and normally that pride is built in the relationships on the team - not so much about the school itself.
I don’t know - I don’t watch the NFL much either, but I can acknowledge it is a far superior on-field product.
I really like The Office. Love it. I’ve watched the entire series multiple times. I don’t like it any less because as the seasons progressed it’s clear the actors made more money. That would be weird.
What this discussion almost feels like to me is we (fans) love this thing (University of Tennessee athletics) so much, and we give so much of our time, money, energy to it with very little in return, that we want the players and athletes to love it that much too - and as a result people think if the athletes are paid that they won’t love their university for the right reasons.
I do see your point. I do agree that if there were not this much money involved, there would likely be no conversation. And, like most, I would not trade my time in college for anything.
Let's just be honest with ourselves.
How exactly, in anyway will it "change the game" or the "passion" of college sports? The vast majority of NCAA athletes will NEVER even make it to the professional level.
If you don't think there is a difference in professional football versus college football, I really don't know how to respond. To me it is night and day different and I think a lot of that has to do with amateurism vs professional.
Your office analogy is flawed because both in scenarios the actors are professional in each circumstance. They just got raises.
Professionalizing college sports will ruin it.
Pretty much everyone in Texas, with a Facebook account, knows to vote "yes" if they don't want a state income tax. I see it every week on my Facebook accountFellow Texan here. Here's the Prop. 4 quoted, "The constitutional amendment prohibiting the imposition of an individual income tax, including a tax on an individual’s share of partnership and unincorporated association income.” So see the slickness? Voting yes will prohibit the imposition of an individual income tax. When most voters who don't spend any time reading it hear income tax, they'll reach for the no lever.
A few coaches picked artists from their area/region. I noticed Muschamp said Darius Rucker who is a gamecock supporter.I'd say Pruitt was just supporting Kenny cause he's from Knoxville. I'd bet coach is more of a George Strait guy if I were a betting man.
But yeah, no doubt Kirby really does love Luke Bryan though. Sissy.
Pretty sure he said Alabama during the “Cornbread” interview. Nothing wrong with that. From right around where he grew up.A few coaches picked artists from their area/region. I noticed Muschamp said Darius Rucker who is a gamecock supporter.
Pruitt probably wanted to say Alabama, which is a great band.
Do you think bagmen, all over the country, report how much money they give to "student athletes" for attending certain universities? Just asking for a friend.If the government is paving the way for these kids to be paid they are going to expect to see the tax dollars flowing in. There will be legal ramifications of people aren't reporting their earnings.
Well, that's where the questions come in. Will it benefit all athletes? Doubtful but it might. And the good players will still be paid. Doubt that stops. Maybe just new creative ways that more people know about. Just not seeing how it will not change how the game is perceived by fans. But like ChattVol I will still cheer for my Vols even though I have checked out on pro sports. Hopefully all the fun won't be taken out of it.Doubtful. There is a difference in College culture. These players are constantly on campus and around their peers. They speak to fans and peers every single day. They play for the school to win to make everyone in the state and the school happy. I don’t think you can really change that with anything. An individual will always have pride for something like that.
Plus let’s be real. The good players are getting paid anyways. This just allows all the athletes to get paid.
Do y’all really think Josh Dobbs shouldn’t have earned a few grand while he was here? Lol