Kavanaugh Confirmation

#8,601
#8,601
McDad said:
Allegations will disappear because Ford will no longer be the needed. Cindy Sheehan and Sandra Fluke ring a bell.
Half will view him as illegitimate because an R nominated him.

Is this the best you got because it's really thin.
Click to expand...
Just more pain and desperation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#8,602
#8,602
Orange_Crush said:
I'm the perfect barometer. I'm no red hat. The problem with you dems is that centrist America isn't as stupid as you think and need us to be. This was transparent. For once in their spineless life, the Rs called your bluff and punched back. America sees you emaciated, blustering, conniving Ds for what you are. Bleeding, lying, unconscionable losers who will try and say anything for political gain.
Click to expand...
You just went medieval on his butt, OC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Orange_Crush
#8,604
#8,604
Stew Cook said:
How is it that Dersh and the ABA thinks there should be an FBI investigation? I've heard repetivelty that its not their job to do so, to the point of being called foolish and worse.

At least I'm in the company of other fools.
Click to expand...

Without question.
 
#8,606
#8,606
Stew Cook said:
No advantage to the Dems to do so. Could be an ignorant staffer, but as a strategy, no way.

I'd guess Cruz.
Click to expand...
You must not be watching the same politics as I. These are the people who encourage protestors to show up at the restaurant you are eating at and shout at you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#8,607
#8,607
Orange_Crush said:
I'm the perfect barometer. I'm no red hat. The problem with you dems is that centrist America isn't as stupid as you think and need us to be. This was transparent. For once in their spineless life, the Rs called your bluff and punched back. America sees you emaciated, blustering, conniving Ds for what you are. Bleeding, lying, unconscionable losers who will try and say anything for political gain.
Click to expand...
Yep, and Graham nailed them for it.
 
#8,610
#8,610
McDad said:
Barometer.
Although, Barameter would be a great name for a bar.
Click to expand...
Or a metric for Obama's lies. Nevermind, there already was one.
Hypocrisy2.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol, Ernest T. Vol and BigOrangeD
#8,611
#8,611
evillawyer said:
That's fine. That's their prerogative. There are no standards that they're subject to in voting up or down. But let's not act like their vote is any formal vindication of Kavanaugh and that these allegations will just disappear. This will be a stain on the court for as long as he's on it. Half of America will view him as illegitimate and a partisan stooge.
Click to expand...
For those that wanted a stain to begin with absolutely. You had D senators publically and on national tv casting their belief to Ford before the accused ever took the stand. Expecting them or their followers to change direction now would be a waste.

The rest can see it for what it is, a story that couldn't be backed up by anyone the victim named including her friend.

Carry on with the screeching
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, Orange_Crush and BigOrangeD
#8,613
#8,613
Orange_Crush said:
I'm the perfect barometer. I'm no red hat. The problem with you dems is that centrist America isn't as stupid as you think and need us to be. This was transparent. For once in their spineless life, the Rs called your bluff and punched back. America sees you emaciated, blustering, conniving Ds for what you are. Bleeding, lying, unconscionable losers who will try and say anything for political gain.
Click to expand...

Wow, you know you can change panties when they get in a bunch like that.
 
#8,618
#8,618
Stew Cook said:
I think you miss the point of disinformation, or reverse psychology if you will. Ask yourself who does this ultimately benefit politically?
Click to expand...
If Judge K gets confirmed, I would have to say America ultimately benefited. Just like Nov 2016
 
#8,619
#8,619
Stew Cook said:
No advantage to the Dems to do so. Could be an ignorant staffer, but as a strategy, no way.

I'd guess Cruz.
Click to expand...

There’s no advantage to try and be Spartacus when it was easily found out that you knew the documents had already been released but he still did it . There’s no advantage for dem protesters to follow Graham down a hallway while he’s giving an interview , but they still did it ... see the pattern ?
 
#8,622
#8,622
InVOLuntary said:
If there ever was a case of the need for term limits, this is it. These jokers get entrenched so deep it's like a crime family. They are bought and paid for. They develop way too much power. They vote in laws that they are never subject to because they're never private citizens again until late in life and then they're super rich. They have taken so much money from special interest groups that they are simply puppets for those groups. They view themselves as royals in a monarchy. The get so much money from special interest groups it makes it impossible to get them out with the ballot box. Most Americans are gullible, choosing their candidate through tainted and biased news media and 15 second political ads. It's broke. Not much hope it will ever get fixed.
Click to expand...

It can be fixed, take away the avenue's of corruption and self serving greed.

Term limits
Low pay
No benefits, of any kind
Yearly forensic audits
Can not become a lobbyist after term is up
Accountability from all budgets and money that is signed off on, no more "waste, lost money, misplaced money", any time things don't add up every individual who has as signature on any piece of paper will be punished and sent to jail.


Last and most importantly, large tax free "rewards" for turning in corruption on every level of city, state, and federal governments.

This is a start that will make change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and InVOLuntary
#8,624
#8,624
evillawyer said:
We can talk criminal standards when we get in a criminal trial. Not there yet. If an employer hears that a prospective employee has a history of getting drunk and fondling women at the bar (a crime), he doesn't have to hold a trial to determine whether or not he wants to hire the guy. He can just decide that he wants to hire someone who doesn't have this reputation.
Click to expand...

K has been interviewing for this job for decades, numerous FBI background checks (which include talking to HS and college associates), an extensive anal probing from the BAR association (per CW) and simply being in the public eye for 20+ years. All without 1 single hint of an allegation of sexual misconduct.

So either the FBI is incompetent, the BAR association is a farce and overlooks sexual misconduct K and friends are masters at covering their tracks or these allegations are ********. Which is it?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top