TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#7,127
#7,127
I have to be honest. Mick, LG, Luther, and those who share the same line of thought, they make me laugh. They eat up every bit of gossip and speculation as if it's somehow truth. It's like those people who read tabloids and believe Big Foot actually kidnaps and rapes people. Doesn't matter how much proof does or does not exist, the fact it impugns Trump is enough to make them believe it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#7,130
#7,130
Conspiracy is a prosecutorial favorite. You don’t even have to be successful in some subversion act. You just have to conspire with others to do so.

It’s a bull**** rap. So probably what Mueller will try.
 
#7,131
#7,131
Grand Vol said:
You know, it's funny that you think Trump is the only businessman ever to screw over people or used them to gain an advantage.
Click to expand...

Please show me where I said he’s the only business man to screw over people.....it’s sad that many of you don’t think he’ll screw over the American people to benefit himself and his brand. It’s what he does
 
#7,133
#7,133
lawgator1 said:
Well, according to Cohen his three clients over the last few years have been Trump, the RNC finance chair, and Hannity.

Hannity says he's not a client. Never billed. Just ocassionally chatted about real estate.

The RNC guy was a one off deal, that's it.

So ....

Who is left and for what reason send him 500k? He's not a client. The money is for something.

You got a non-laughable explanation that does not involve Trump?
Click to expand...

Cohen works for free, all the best NYC attorneys work for free. Common knowledge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,134
#7,134
Mick said:
You are aware that those "leaked" questions were compiled and leaked by the Trump camp based on questions asked to other people Mueller interviewed.
Click to expand...

I am aware this is what you believe.


I am also aware you can offer no substantive proof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,135
#7,135
Septic said:
Cohen works for free, all the best NYC attorneys work for free. Common knowledge.
Click to expand...

I didn't know anything about Michael Cohen's bio other than he is known as Trump's "fixer", so I just Googled him assuming that he had gone to law school at Harvard. How wrong that assumption was. Not only did he not go to Harvard or some other Ivy League College of Law, he went to literally the worst law school in the country. Indeed, Michael Cohen is a proud graduate of the Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing, Michigan Class of 1991. Here are some facts about this... ahem, "law school?":

* The school accepts almost anyone who can pay the $51,000 annual tuition bill. More than 85% of it's applicants were admitted last year.

* Fewer than half of it's graduates manage to pass the bar exam on their first try; among all law school graduates in the country, about 75% pass on their first attempt.

* The 46 year old school had to go to court last year to fight for it's accreditation from the American Bar Association which found that the school was out of compliance on basic admission standards for a time.

* Last year, the National Advisory Council for Law School Transparency gave Cooley a ranking no school wants: It was #1 on the group's list of "the 10 least selective law schools in the country".

It is not hyperbole to say that Michael Cohen graduated from the worst law school in the country... and this guy is the personal attorney for the President of the United States of America? Seriously?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7,136
#7,136
Honest, sincere question(yes I'm aware I'm throwing out a curveball here). To all our anti-Trump posters. Do all of you actually believe your arguments, or are a lot of your arguments for pure entertainment? Let's be truthful, sometimes a little trolling can be fun. Imagining how riled up your getting another poster. Hell, I enjoy it from time to time. I'm just curious if you truly believe all the speculation you throw out there is somehow legitimate fact?
 
#7,137
#7,137
LouderVol said:
ehh, doubt that. Trump will be followed by this like all the Killary stuff does Hillary. opinion is about all that matters now in politics. none of them are going to jail, neither side wants a president in jail, or anyone high up. sets a dangerous precedent, this is being milked for political points in the midterms.
Click to expand...
Nanci Pelosi will be dead in 10 years. She couldn't care less if sending Trump (for example) to prison sets any kind of precedent.
 
#7,138
#7,138
Weezer said:
Honest, sincere question(yes I'm aware I'm throwing out a curveball here). To all our anti-Trump posters. Do all of you actually believe your arguments, or are a lot of your arguments for pure entertainment? Let's be truthful, sometimes a little trolling can be fun. Imagining how riled up your getting another poster. Hell, I enjoy it from time to time. I'm just curious if you truly believe all the speculation you throw out there is somehow legitimate fact?
Click to expand...

I personally find the arguments of the liberals on this forum much more compelling than the arguments of the conservatives because the liberals support their opinions with facts. For example, when a liberal says that Donald Trump's personal attorney went to a $hitty law school, he supports that belief with facts.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,139
#7,139
I'm curious if this is true. I read that after Comey was fired, Trump interviewed Mueller to once again lead the FBI but decided against it. A day later, Mueller was appointed SC. Before anyone gets their panties ruffled, I'm not throwing this out there as factual information. And hell, for all I know, this may have been discussed thoroughly in the past. I'm just curious if others have read this and if proof of its accuracy is out there. If such proof exists, I'm curious how getting turned down for the job by the person you're investigating doesn't amount to a conflict of interest?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,140
#7,140
Weezer said:
Honest, sincere question(yes I'm aware I'm throwing out a curveball here). To all our anti-Trump posters. Do all of you actually believe your arguments, or are a lot of your arguments for pure entertainment? Let's be truthful, sometimes a little trolling can be fun. Imagining how riled up your getting another poster. Hell, I enjoy it from time to time. I'm just curious if you truly believe all the speculation you throw out there is somehow legitimate fact?
Click to expand...

I think that donny comes very close to the clinical definition of retarded.

Does that answer your question?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,141
#7,141
BowlBrother85 said:
I personally find the arguments of the liberals on this forum much more compelling than the arguments of the conservatives because the liberals support their opinions with facts. For example, when a liberal says that Donald Trump's personal attorney went to a $hitty law school, he supports that belief with facts.

:)
Click to expand...

Well I know you're bull****ting me because none of our libs have offered up actual facts showing Trump's guilt.

:)
 
#7,142
#7,142
Weezer said:
I'm curious if this is true. I read that after Comey was fired, Trump interviewed Mueller to once again lead the FBI but decided against it. A day later, Mueller was appointed SC. Before anyone gets their panties ruffled, I'm not throwing this out there as factual information. And hell, for all I know, this may have been discussed thoroughly in the past. I'm just curious if others have read this and if proof of its accuracy is out there. If such proof exists, I'm curious how getting turned down for the job by the person you're investigating doesn't amount to a conflict of interest?
Click to expand...

I'm curious where you read that. Breitbart? I'm skeptical. I saw where Joe Lieberman was under consideration for a time for FBI Director but the name Christopher Wray surfaced pretty soon thereafter. Trump would have tweeted about this a hundred times by now if this was true... He has never said that he interviewed Mueller for FBI Director.
 
#7,143
#7,143
Septic said:
I think that donny comes very close to the clinical definition of retarded.

Does that answer your question?
Click to expand...

I can see that. But I can also see an argument for him being some type of Rain Man. Brilliant in his own unique way. He certainly isn't a sociable type of guy. But I don't see that as an automatic disqualification for being POTUS.
 
#7,144
#7,144
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm curious where you read that. Breitbart? I'm skeptical. I saw where Joe Lieberman was under consideration for a time for FBI Director but the name Christopher Wray surfaced pretty soon thereafter. Trump would have tweeted about this a hundred times by now if this was true... He has never said that he interviewed Mueller for FBI Director.
Click to expand...

From the same source you used to read about Cohen. Wiki.
 
#7,145
#7,145
And before it's thrown out there, no, I do not consider Wiki an accurate source, which is why I'm questioning its validity.
 
#7,146
#7,146
Weezer said:
From the same source you used to read about Cohen. Wiki.
Click to expand...

My source on Cohen was Politico. Google "Michael Cohen Law School" and the title "Trump's Lawyer Went to the Worst Law School in America" - Politico Magazine is the first link that will appear. However, Fortune also has an article entitled "Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen Went to a Uniquely Awful Law School" near the top of the page.
 
#7,147
#7,147
BowlBrother85 said:
My source on Cohen was Politico. Google "Michael Cohen Law School" and the title "Trump's Lawyer Went to the Worst Law School in America" - Politico Magazine is the first link that will appear. However, Fortune also has an article entitled "Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen Went to a Uniquely Awful Law School" near the top of the page.
Click to expand...

Not really trying to defend Cohen, but going to a crappy school doesn't necessarily mean you're crappy at your job. There may have been extenuating circumstances that led him to attend there. That said, this recent weirdness with large sums of money being funneled into his shell companies certainly has a Mafioso air about it. Interested to see where this goes.
 
#7,148
#7,148
Weezer said:
And before it's thrown out there, no, I do not consider Wiki an accurate source, which is why I'm questioning its validity.
Click to expand...

I mean come on, if Trump had interviewed Mueller and then turned him down for the job and Mueller was appointed Special Counsel the very next day??? Can you imagine the frogs that would be raining down from the right over that? Trump would be tweeting about it constantly and so would Devin Nunes... Sean Hannity would have had a heart attack by now. Obviously, some Trump fan edited Mueller's wiki page. That's why wiki sucks.
 
#7,149
#7,149
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm curious where you read that. Breitbart? I'm skeptical. I saw where Joe Lieberman was under consideration for a time for FBI Director but the name Christopher Wray surfaced pretty soon thereafter. Trump would have tweeted about this a hundred times by now if this was true... He has never said that he interviewed Mueller for FBI Director.
Click to expand...

Apparently true.

Trump interviewed Mueller for FBI director - CNNPolitics


And I'm even using the libs Bible as my source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,150
#7,150
Weezer said:
Apparently true.

Trump interviewed Mueller for FBI director - CNNPolitics


And I'm even using the libs Bible as my source.
Click to expand...

That is interesting and I didn't know that they had spoken but there isn't much said about how serious Mueller was in the job or if Trump in fact, told Mueller that he wasn't interested in hiring him. I don't think it's customary to tell someone you aren't considering them the same day as the interview and before the job is filled. But who knows what happened?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top