TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#7,101
#7,101
volinbham said:
I disagree. If Mueller thought the Russians were supplying the cash to pay off SD you don't think there would be some questions about Russian payments to Cohen on the list of questions to ask Trump? Like did you know about this?

Why would you think no questions would involve this situation if Mueller were pursuing it?
Click to expand...

I didn't make my point clear. We don't know that these "leaked questions" included EVERYTHING the Mueller team intended to ask Trump.
 
#7,104
#7,104
BowlBrother85 said:
I didn't make my point clear. We don't know that these "leaked questions" included EVERYTHING the Mueller team intended to ask Trump.
Click to expand...

My understanding is they were part of the negotiated scope of an on the record interview.

What are you seeing that suggests there were more?
 
#7,106
#7,106
volinbham said:
My understanding is they were part of the negotiated scope of an on the record interview.

What are you seeing that suggests there were more?
Click to expand...

I think whoever "leaked" the content of the questions did so because they were trying to show that they were frivolous questions. It wouldn't surprise me if they left out some things.
 
#7,107
#7,107
BowlBrother85 said:
I think whoever "leaked" the content of the questions did so because they were trying to show that they were frivolous questions. It wouldn't surprise me if they left out some things.
Click to expand...

So assuming the list is accurate my point stands.

If it is inaccurate it doesn't.

I haven't seen any reporting suggesting it is inaccurate. Have you? (not arguing; genuinely curious).

The point about turning the Cohen stuff over to NY still stands as an indication this isn't some Russia paying for SD "collusion".
 
#7,108
#7,108
volinbham said:
I disagree. If Mueller thought the Russians were supplying the cash to pay off SD you don't think there would be some questions about Russian payments to Cohen on the list of questions to ask Trump? Like did you know about this?

Why would you think no questions would involve this situation if Mueller were pursuing it?
Click to expand...

You are aware that those "leaked" questions were compiled and leaked by the Trump camp based on questions asked to other people Mueller interviewed.
 
#7,110
#7,110
Last edited:
#7,112
#7,112
BowlBrother85 said:
I think whoever "leaked" the content of the questions did so because they were trying to show that they were frivolous questions. It wouldn't surprise me if they left out some things.
Click to expand...


It wasn't Mueller's team that wrote that set of questions, or leaked them.
 
#7,113
#7,113
volinbham said:
So assuming the list is accurate my point stands.

If it is inaccurate it doesn't.

I haven't seen any reporting suggesting it is inaccurate. Have you? (not arguing; genuinely curious).

The point about turning the Cohen stuff over to NY still stands as an indication this isn't some Russia paying for SD "collusion".
Click to expand...

Without knowing who leaked the questions it's hard to say. Leaks result because someone has an agenda at hand.
 
#7,114
#7,114
BowlBrother85 said:
Do you really have to ask? Tucker is talking about NY Attorney General (D) Eric Schneiderman's resignation of course. They love to talk about scandals involving the sexual harassment or domestic abuse of women as long as it doesn't involve one of their own employees or their founder. Tucker probably won't even mention this story unless it's to further the 'witch hunt' narrative.
Click to expand...

So a story that broke last night?

Just like CNN's coverage of Stormy Daniels, huh?
 
#7,115
#7,115
BowlBrother85 said:
Without knowing who leaked the questions it's hard to say. Leaks result because someone has an agenda at hand.
Click to expand...

This entire thing is about agendas! Name a player in this saga that doesn't have an agenda.

We have people posting info from a porn star's lawyer as hard core evidence FFS.

I will be surprised if it indeed turns out that Russia funded the SD payment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,116
#7,116
Mick said:
The VN faithful won't care.
Click to expand...

I beg to differ. Offer actual proof instead of reckless speculation and I'll actually give quite a damn. The problem is that all you and your friends have to offer is what you hope to be true, not anything you've actually proven to be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,117
#7,117
Weezer said:
I beg to differ. Offer actual proof instead of reckless speculation and I'll actually give quite a damn. The problem is that all you and your friends have to offer is what you hope to be true, not anything you've actually proven to be true.
Click to expand...

Trump Tower meeting happened. That is True. There were Russians in the meeting along with Jr, Manafort, and Kushner. Adoptions was not on the agenda. Dirt on Hillary was.
 
#7,118
#7,118
Mick said:
Trump Tower meeting happened. That is True. There were Russians in the meeting along with Jr, Manafort, and Kushner. Adoptions was not on the agenda. Dirt on Hillary was.
Click to expand...

Let's assume all that is true. What is the charge? And who could be charged?
 
#7,120
#7,120
volinbham said:
This entire thing is about agendas! Name a player in this saga that doesn't have an agenda.

We have people posting info from a porn star's lawyer as hard core evidence FFS.

I will be surprised if it indeed turns out that Russia funded the SD payment.
Click to expand...

I have to say this... and laugh at me if you must... but I haven't seen Robert Mueller's integrity credibly impugned as of yet, though many people in the Trump camp and on Fox News have tried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,121
#7,121
Mick said:
Trump Tower meeting happened. That is True. There were Russians in the meeting along with Jr, Manafort, and Kushner. Adoptions was not on the agenda. Dirt on Hillary was.
Click to expand...

Bon appétit
 

Attachments

  • 155812B5-8977-473C-82C8-E12C490399C0.jpeg
    155812B5-8977-473C-82C8-E12C490399C0.jpeg
    138.9 KB · Views: 2
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,123
#7,123
BowlBrother85 said:
I have to say this... and laugh at me if you must... but I haven't seen Robert Mueller's integrity credibly impugned as of yet, though many people in the Trump camp and on Fox News have tried.
Click to expand...

Then you really know nothing of his past, he let innocent men serve prison time in order to protect an informant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,124
#7,124
BowlBrother85 said:
I have to say this... and laugh at me if you must... but I haven't seen Robert Mueller's integrity credibly impugned as of yet, though many people in the Trump camp and on Fox News have tried.
Click to expand...

One judge did so quite demonstrably this week.

I'd also argue that if he is truly looking at Russian influence he'd turn a gaze at the dossier that was significantly sourced from the Russian government. A man of integrity would look at all forms of influence in the election and political entanglement with Russia. As of yet there are no signs he is considering this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top