Yes, I see what you mean. It wouldnt be giving back to him like he did to UT with the Schiano deal. At the same time, I wonder if letting him leave on a win and then him resigning (thereby saving UT money) could be a good strategy. Perhaps Gruden isnt interested at this point and so hiring someone who cant be easily controlled and is a pretty good coach felt like a win for the good guys. I hope Gruden comes, obviously, but I have no way of knowing if he still wants to. Im just trying to think of a reason the boosters might have decided to go this route.
Now, we may wake up tomorrow to the news that Leach turned us down as well, right?