theFallGuy
I Love the Smell of Napalm In the Morning
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 77,958
- Likes
- 78,836
The evidence just doesn't support it - aTm & MZ coming into the SEC successfully, Vandy's rise, Ole Miss's rise, MState's rise, etc. etc.
Some time, but not an eternity which is what 6-7 years looks like in college FB.
Probably not the best timing of that opinion with a divisional opponent looking at returning to the SEC Championship game in year one of a "rebuild". Butch needs to win out and get to Atlanta next year.
Some would argue butch is the problem.
Butch Jones: It takes six or seven years in the SEC to build a program
An excerpt from the article...
While we live in a world of instant gratification, Jones just in his 3rd season in Knoxville scaled back expectations a little and indicated that he may need an additional three years at the least to fully bring the Vols back to prominence. Jones identified weak spots right now in the program such as the offensive line, defensive line and receivers.
6-7 years to become prominent? Wow! I bet our last two stellar recruiting classes love digesting this piece of news.
Thanks in advance for getting us to the "Promised Land" boys, even though you'll never see it.
WTF???
Butch Jones: It takes six or seven years in the SEC to build a program
An excerpt from the article...
While we live in a world of instant gratification, Jones just in his 3rd season in Knoxville scaled back expectations a little and indicated that he may need an additional three years at the least to fully bring the Vols back to prominence. Jones identified weak spots right now in the program such as the offensive line, defensive line and receivers.
Florida wasn't a rebuild. They've always,been loaded with tallent. They just had to get rid of the doofus they had as a coach.
yeah and whatever we do lets not give Butch any credit at all, for having the team competitive in those games instead of just being blown out. Butch is the reason the team played well enough to win those games in the first place.
I just honestly don't understand the ignorance displayed by some in our fan base.
You have to look at the starting point. If a coach takes over a 9-10 win team it's hard to improve 1.5-2 games per year. When you start at 5 with 3 OOC creampuffs on the schedule and a weak SEC E it's not that difficult.
I agree, you make an excellent point..."hey Jalen, come play at Tennessee, your home school. Come bust your arse for 3 years, come help us recruit players, come help us promote the program.....and 3 years after you're long gone I'm gonna get this team to winning at a high, consistent level."
"Hey fans, just wait for it, we're gonna win a championship of some kind at Tennessee, it's coming......it's just gonna take twice as much time as every other coach is given and 5 to 6 years longer than it's taken McElwain down in Florida."
Jones may be right, he may need 6 or 7 years......but it's incredibly tone deaf and just an awful message to send to both the fans and players alike IMO.
Edit: I just don't understand his thinking in saying this at the moment. He's doing a great job with the program, he had a signature win vs Georgia and played Bama down to the wire....he should be feeling little to no heat right now....90% of fans are good with him, as he likely gets us to 8 wins and a decent bowl game. Did he damn near singlehandedly cost us 2 very good wins vs OU and Florida due to his poor gameday coaching acumen? Yes, it's well-documented. But nobody is calling for his job, things are going well, most of us are all good. Why say this?
CWM was a great recruiter while he was at Florida. CJM is very fortunate.
For those folks, I'd respond: the "problem" has us improving at a rate of +1.5 to +2 games per year. 5 in '13, 7 in '14, likely 8 or 9 in '15.
That rate of improvement is almost unheard of in Tennessee history.
We need more "problems" like that.
Of course you have to look at the starting point. Not talking about guys who take over the Vols when we're winning 8, 9 games a year and continue the success (Neyland, Fulmer, others).
This chart shows the first three years (#wins) for each Tennessee coach throughout our history who faced a rebuilding job.
![]()
Some things jump right out at you: almost all of the coaches achieved success to one degree or another. Only Dooley took the team downhill. Even Wyatt had net gain over the three years, even though he regressed from Year 2 to Year 3.
The next thing you notice is that Jones' trend looks very similar to the trendlines of Johnny Majors and Z.G. Clevenger. All three heading steadily upward. What is less obvious at first glance is that Butch will outperform both of them if he wins out (including bowl win). Butch matches Doug Dickey's success in his first three years, as well. Being favorably compared to Dickey, Majors and Clevenger, that's pretty good company.
So yes, it hurt to lose to OK and FL after leading them for much of the game. Sucks, to be honest. And yes, it was clearly possible for Team 119 to have gone 11-2 rather than 9-4, if we'd held out to win those two matches.
But that hypothetical scenario would just ADD to Butch's success, which is already matching the best in our history for rebuilding eras. Those two almost-wins don't detract from what you see in this chart--they would've added to it.
No, Butch is the man. Those who are hating on him are wrong. He's definitely got the program moving in the right direction.
Honest question to those who defend Lyle at all cost- do you really not understand that the SEC East has SIGNIFICANTLY come back to the pack? That it is historically bad? Take us out of the equation- do you really not understand that the Florida team that is about to be in the SEC Championship game has major, major holes, and that the normal Florida teams we are use to would crush this year's team?
Year one was no improvement. Year two we improved by one game (excluding post season). This year could be a two game improvement. In three years we have have went from five wins to the possibility of eight. That is an average of one game improvement per year under Butch from Dooley unless year one is year zero.
And your point, 500?
The B10 is weak. But Ohio State is arguably the best team in the country. Certainly one of the best.
You think Florida is going to shed tears that they got to the SEC CG against a weaker-than-normal division? If they make it to the playoffs after beating an SEC West champion in Atlanta, you think they're going to give back their trophy because the East is down?
Butch is climbing the ladder, as illustrated above, and is doing so no matter what the rest of the East looks like.
Our opponents are weak in part because we have made them look weak by beating them.
Some folks always set their own team at '0' and judge the world in comparison. Which means anyone they beat was in the negative numbers, a weak team.
In absolute terms, Tennessee is a very good football team this year. All the measuring systems other than popularity polls (Sagarin, Steele, ESPN FPI, etc.) recognize that.
Just because some in VolNation don't, that doesn't mean the rest of us have to with them.