VolsSportsFan
Random
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 75,373
- Likes
- 49,385
I was addressing the credibility reference.
Arguing opinions doesn't really involve credibility.
One guy values the NIT, most don't.
So what?
He's held himself as someone as credibility because of his past, and it goes well past just this NIT issue. He just called himself a scientist yet any rational person reading his posts would laugh at that notion.
Differing opinions is fine, but when "proof" offered to backup said opinion is thoroughly torn apart, then the credibility of said opinion is fair game.
