kptvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Messages
- 27,294
- Likes
- 1
Dorrell was just as successful at UCLA as Cut was at Ole Miss. Dorrell might be able to inject a little excitement. Cutcliffe isn't the most exciting guy. He's not going to add anything to that program.
i'm sure it was very exciting for bruin fans to watch a winless notre dame team get their first victory this year in the rose bowl. how many bowl games did dorrell win at ucla? his talent level at ucla was greater than cut's at ole miss and he did less. i'm not taking up for cut but dorrell's terrible and if i had the choose one of two, cut would be the easy choice.
i'm not saying that he his the best. i'm only saying that it is an insult to compare him with someone that should be a high school coordinating coach.
I believe I said he was the best for the program at this point in time... and he was.
But, BPV will just twist whatever you say, spit out something stupid, and then use personal attacks to defend his position. He's got an incredible inferiority complex for someone who can contribute something sometimes.
I'd say you're the one in the more indefensible position. You've been bandying about you're little train for a coach who hasn't won anything meaningful in 9 years. Moreover, you haven't made a lucid point since you've been here. If your drivel required twisting to make you look silly, I'd twist away, but you do plenty of damage yourself. I don't want credit for your looking silly.I believe I said he was the best for the program at this point in time... and he was.
But, BPV will just twist whatever you say, spit out something stupid, and then use personal attacks to defend his position. He's got an incredible inferiority complex for someone who can contribute something sometimes.
what on earth are you talking about, we had a bandwagon headed to Atlanta.any chance he'll take chavis and slade with him?
seriously, after the opponents hung 1500+ yds. and an ungodly number of points on the vols in three games, i was hoping fulmer would can their butts. but, i got to admit, the defense outplayed the offense the last four games. whether that is a reflection on our offense, i don't know. i just hope that next year, it is not mid-november when chavis realizes he's got a job to do.
That was point in the other thread about O. He's no long-term solution.
What do you think about Kippy?
I'm trying to listen.
I agree 100%. Let's get away from the guys that look at CPF as Father UT Football. While any OC would have to defer to Fulmer to some degree, that type does so wholeheartedly.I'm not really excited about him. He didn't do a very good job with the Texans. I think he's doing OK for the Lions. I'd rather just get someone outside the UT family. I think that would be best for Fulmer. If he brings in another UT guy and he's not successful... People are going to think Fulmer can do nothing but hire UT guys. And if that's the case, he needs to go.
I'm not really excited about him. He didn't do a very good job with the Texans. I think he's doing OK for the Lions. I'd rather just get someone outside the UT family. I think that would be best for Fulmer. If he brings in another UT guy and he's not successful... People are going to think Fulmer can do nothing but hire UT guys. And if that's the case, he needs to go.