hmanvolfan
Volmeister extraordinaire
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2004
- Messages
- 100,899
- Likes
- 54,616
I didn't read the Gettysburg Address or recite the Game Maxims either. So what?
Isn't it a little early in the day to be drinking, smoking or whatever it is you're doing to completely misunderstand everything I type?
Just read posts 72 thru 80 minus 78.
I thought you had a valid opinion so I seriously asked if you thought football should be banned. Guess I could've followed up in the same post by asking what you thought would be a good solution if not a ban. Sorry for all the confusion.Sorry, that doesn't clear it up for me. I denied being a troll and commented that I'm seeing football changing due to head injuries (targeting personal fouls, ejections, players being held out, coaches being scrutinized for example). Then you asked if football should be banned which I interpret as a snarky question. Were you seriously asking me if I thought football should be banned after I said that I was concerned that head injuries were changing the game? You didn't ask if I thought football would be banned, you asked me if I thought it should be banned. Then you point out that I didn't offer a solution. Help me out here.
That doesn't mean the answer is to "not hit so hard" as you've implied. The answer is better coaching and better equipment
I thought you had a valid opinion so I seriously asked if you thought football should be banned. Guess I could've followed up in the same post by asking what you thought would be a good solution if not a ban. Sorry for all the confusion.
When you took issue with the "blood lust for violent hits" what did you mean by that?
Because it sounds a lot like "we shouldn't hit people so hard".