Smh... Gotta show some promise on the field before we recruit to our abilities...
Mizzou probably. Not great but not picked up out of the bargain bin like a few of our other commits.
I'm not happy with our recruiting either but UT just isn't as attractive right now. Either CDD steps up this year and it'll pick up or Hart will find somebody who will.
Let me guess...
"Still in on some big fish..."
"Several five stars have us in their top three..."
"inb4 the star gazers show up"
"BOOMWORTHY?"
"Rivals would give him his fifth star if he hadn't committed to UT..."
Does it go something like that?
You're right it's so much more sophisticated and intelligent in the FB forum.
"Dooley sucks because... !"
"Jon Gruden will never leave tampa.."
"Rod Wilks > everything else"
"Should have hired Cowher. Money talks!"
"Once Dooley is gone if Hart doesn't give Gruden a blank check, I'm done..."
"Espn hates us"
"Fulmer for AD!"
"You guys think Brady Hoke will coach UT for $5mil/yr?"
"ESPNU? Such bs!"
"Any practice updates yet?"
I'm sure I left out some really good ones but does that sound about right?
True.
However, while we wait for on the field results, the talent gap grows between our teams. That, and we don't have much evidence that our staff can coach up the players to compete with the more talented teams, much less achieve those wins that we need.
This is incorrect, although there still is a substantial talent gap, it has only decreased since Dooley has been HC.