FBI: Russian Nuclear Official Wired Millions to Clinton Foundation in Bribery Plot

#101
#101
Septic said:
So did Shep Smith not blow this fake news up sufficiently enough?

My word, you guys bit hard on the very thing you profess to hate the most. Hook, line and sinker by the people you trust the most, Hannity and Carlson got absolutely punked by another Fox anchor.

How salty are the Fox viewers right now?
Click to expand...

you mean where he contradicts himself in the same breath?

Smith called the statement “inaccurate in a number of ways,” noting that “the Clinton State Department had no power to veto or approve that transaction.” Rather, it must be approved by an interagency committee of the government consisting of nine department heads, including the secretary of state.
Click to expand...

really not sure how those two things don't trigger some braincells with people.

Hilary didn't have any power over it, but she was one of the deciding votes that I am pretty sure has to be unanimous. makes sense right?

this is why you actually have to read the statements yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#102
#102
LouderVol said:
you mean where he contradicts himself in the same breath?



really not sure how those two things don't trigger some braincells with people.

Hilary didn't have any power over it, but she was one of the deciding votes that I am pretty sure has to be unanimous. makes sense right?

this is why you actually have to read the statements yourself.
Click to expand...


It completely shts on the notion the she, mueller and the russians were doing some nefarious backroom deal.

Look at the title of this thread, it's completely fabricated fake news. So many on the right are completely bamboozled by the very crap they claim is a product of the left.

Yes, you've got her now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#103
#103
Septic said:
It completely shts on the notion the she, mueller and the russians were doing some nefarious backroom deal.

Look at the title of this thread, it's completely fabricated fake news. So many on the right are completely bamboozled by the very crap they claim is a product of the left.

Yes, you've got her now.
Click to expand...

The only thing it does is shift all the blame on her to some of the blame on her. and thats only for the mouth breathers and those who never bothered to look into how it worked.

and why would someone on the Russian side tied to the Uranium deal with Canada give her a substantial amount of money if she had no voice in the deal? She clearly did. Again the "debunking" zooms way in on one sentence of the "conspiracy" disproves it on a technicality and says the whole thing is therefore false. even though the debunking doesn't actually prove her innocent and isn't even centered on the real argument.
 
#104
#104
LouderVol said:
The only thing it does is shift all the blame on her to some of the blame on her. and thats only for the mouth breathers and those who never bothered to look into how it worked.

and why would someone on the Russian side tied to the Uranium deal with Canada give her a substantial amount of money if she had no voice in the deal? She clearly did. Again the "debunking" zooms way in on one sentence of the "conspiracy" disproves it on a technicality and says the whole thing is therefore false. even though the debunking doesn't actually prove her innocent and isn't even centered on the real argument.
Click to expand...


That money was donated to the foundation long before she was even Secretary of State. LOL

Anyway you slice it, it's fake news. My advice is to drop this and investigate Benghazi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#105
#105
Septic said:
That money was donated to the foundation long before she was even Secretary of State. LOL

Anyway you slice it, it's fake news. My advice is to drop this and investigate Benghazi.
Click to expand...

but wait I thought she didn't have a say, even though she had a vote in what takes a unanimous decision.

also the money ultimately came from Russia (Canadian has deep ties with the Russians) and we care about the Russian hookers Trump had from 2007 or whenever it was, so it seems pretty relevant.

and it wasn't all the money they got from Russia
FBI surprised Bill Clinton took $500,000 from Russia | Daily Mail Online

plenty of money trading hands.
 
#106
#106
Septic said:
That money was donated to the foundation long before she was even Secretary of State. LOL

Anyway you slice it, it's fake news. My advice is to drop this and investigate Benghazi.
Click to expand...

There's a sucker born every minute and they all watch Fox News. Deductive reasoning is in short supply when it comes to Trump Supporters.

Meanwhile, Trump has made 1,628 false or misleading statements since taking office. That's a whopping 5.5 lies per day from Trump. That's a mind-boggling statistic but the Trumpsters continue to buy his nonsense like good little sheep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#107
#107
Septic said:
It completely shts on the notion the she, mueller and the russians were doing some nefarious backroom deal.

Look at the title of this thread, it's completely fabricated fake news. So many on the right are completely bamboozled by the very crap they claim is a product of the left.

Yes, you've got her now.
Click to expand...

How so?
 
#109
#109
armchair said:
wasn't at all involved in this, as the story notes. So nice try. She wasn't involved in approving the sale of the uranium company--which was a Canadian company with operations in the United States. As for Russian money going to the Clinton Foundation, the story doesn't say who sent it but does note that it was funneled via a third party.

The Clinton Foundation, by the way, has an excellent reputation.
Click to expand...

Poor old armchair. Bless your marxist heart
 
#110
#110
FBI informant has video of Russian agents with briefcases of bribe money in Clinton-Uranium scandal

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO0Lh8gOu5Q[/youtube]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#111
#111
Reuters released the informants name... no wonder he's fearing for his life. He'll be suicided shortly. RIP
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#115
#115
Oh the irony of all the Russian meddling blithering
 
#116
#116
Rasputin_Vol said:
Nothing will come of this.
Click to expand...

Possibly not. The FBI informant has tapes and recordings. He was allegedly strong-armed and deceived by the FBI, which he filed a civil lawsuit about...they (FBI/Justice Dept) threatened his reputation and liberty if he didn't drop the case.

His attorney Victoria Toensing is highly respected and does her homework before taking on a case. She's a quiet pitbull...

Victoria Toensing, the attorney representing the FBI informant, said there's "on-the-record quid pro quo" surrounding the deal, with Bill Clinton receiving a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank and the Clinton Foundation getting tens of millions of dollars from people interested in the Uranium One deal.

Bribes and kick-backs are NOT legal, in case you are unaware.

Access Denied

The Obama cabinet all knew about the Russian deal and this FBI case on Russian deal etc...and NO news outlet has invited his attorney on tv but Fox...ISN'T THAT IRONIC? The lead FBI informant's attorney has not been asked to come on and speak about her client...what a swampy mess.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#117
#117
TN Ribs said:
There's a sucker born every minute and they all watch Fox News. Deductive reasoning is in short supply when it comes to Trump Supporters.

Meanwhile, Trump has made 1,628 false or misleading statements since taking office. That's a whopping 5.5 lies per day from Trump. That's a mind-boggling statistic but the Trumpsters continue to buy his nonsense like good little sheep.
Click to expand...

Fox most balanced, most unbiased. They do not 'rush to judgement' like 90% of the media. That's a fact, we all know that..come on. Fox was 52 percent negative and 48 percent positive toward Trump. The network that is often derided by the rest of the media for being too pro-Trump was actually the fairest, according to the Harvard researchers.
I have to be fair, Fox certainly has more of a progressive/conservative slant in my view.

When a recent Harvard study shows 93% of the time the CNN, NBC media press is negative on Trump in the past 3 months...Even as the media whine about about Trump, their hostile coverage shows no let up. Media Research Center's study of news in June, July and August found an identical rate of 91 percent negative coverage — which means TV news is unchanged in its hostility toward the president...there's several other studies, and the media spins it every which way but lose for 'click bait' and 'tune-in' purposes. Negative 'bad' press sells, unfortunately. Everyone knows the truth, even you're not that foolish.

Now about lying, not gonna go to far down that rabbit hole, but please get off your high horse...

According to a 2002 study conducted by the University of Massachusetts, 60% of adults can't have a ten minute conversation without lying at least once. But even that number makes it sound better than it really is; those people in the study who did lie actually told an average of 3 lies during their brief chat.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#118
#118
Vol0725 said:
Fox most balanced, most unbiased. They do not 'rush to judgement' like 90% of the media. That's a fact, we all know that..come on. Fox was 52 percent negative and 48 percent positive toward Trump. The network that is often derided by the rest of the media for being too pro-Trump was actually the fairest, according to the Harvard researchers.
I have to be fair, Fox certainly has more of a progressive/conservative slant in my view.

When a recent Harvard study shows 93% of the time the CNN, NBC media press is negative on Trump in the past 3 months...Even as the media whine about about Trump, their hostile coverage shows no let up. Media Research Center's study of news in June, July and August found an identical rate of 91 percent negative coverage — which means TV news is unchanged in its hostility toward the president...there's several other studies, and the media spins it every which way but lose for 'click bait' and 'tune-in' purposes. Negative 'bad' press sells, unfortunately. Everyone knows the truth, even you're not that foolish.

Now about lying, not gonna go to far down that rabbit hole, but please get off your high horse...

According to a 2002 study conducted by the University of Massachusetts, 60% of adults can't have a ten minute conversation without lying at least once. But even that number makes it sound better than it really is; those people in the study who did lie actually told an average of 3 lies during their brief chat.
Click to expand...

Full stop.

cosby-no.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#119
#119
Vol0725 said:
Possibly not. The FBI informant has tapes and recordings. He was allegedly strong-armed and deceived by the FBI, which he filed a civil lawsuit about...they (FBI/Justice Dept) threatened his reputation and liberty if he didn't drop the case.

His attorney Victoria Toensing is highly respected and does her homework before taking on a case. She's a quiet pitbull...

Victoria Toensing, the attorney representing the FBI informant, said there's "on-the-record quid pro quo" surrounding the deal, with Bill Clinton receiving a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian bank and the Clinton Foundation getting tens of millions of dollars from people interested in the Uranium One deal.

Bribes and kick-backs are NOT legal, in case you are unaware.

Access Denied

The Obama cabinet all knew about the Russian deal and this FBI case on Russian deal etc...and NO news outlet has invited his attorney on tv but Fox...ISN'T THAT IRONIC? The lead FBI informant's attorney has not been asked to come on and speak about her client...what a swampy mess.
Click to expand...

Bribes, kickbacks, and other funny things are perfectly legal in libbieland - if you don't get caught. Murder by suicide is perfectly acceptable to ensure libs don't get involved in any "shady" investigations.

Deflection is one of their other great tools. Charge the opposition with a scandal, the press will jump on it, and during the ensuing investigation everyone will forget about the real stink in the room - that is assured by the use of the pet media (whether by subterfuge, accident, or outright incompetence).
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top