lol I'm sure that makes you sleep better at night thinking that was the reason UT lost to UF again(and Hunter going down)..not the fact your ST sucked, no running game, sucking on third down and your D allowing JB to look like a SEC QB or a 165 RB to go for over 100yards rushing and rec. :lol:
Those same guys may leave UF never losing to UT.
You were a hall monitor in school weren't you. :yes:
You are incorrect.WR have one of the easiest playbooks to learn though honestly. The RB has blockingg schemes, running plays, and passing plays. The Oline has to learn a system which is much harder then it sounds on the surface because you work as such a unit.
CP has run the routes he will be asked to run. Its a matter of getting acclimated with the playcalling more then anythingg probably and getting time to throw a lot with TBray. Also on many variations you are basically calling out to the receiver their route.
The biggest challenge is he may be asked to know 2 or 3 positions and whatnot.
Also he must get out there with DaRick, Tyler, and Justin and work work work to get timing ect down.
If they do that it could be one special year.
You are incorrect.
WRs have much more to learn than routes. They have to know and make various reads on each play. Some of the reads are not easy to make and you have to hope that the QB is on the same page as you are and gets the same reads. That has to be made in a nanosecond. Each read, changes the route run, the depth of a route to be run.
You are incorrect.
WRs have much more to learn than routes. They have to know and make various reads on each play. Some of the reads are not easy to make and you have to hope that the QB is on the same page as you are and gets the same reads. That has to be made in a nanosecond. Each read, changes the route run, the depth of a route to be run.
Butthurt, it's what's for dinner.
Also, for the many plays, few plays debate, here is an example of the smaller version and arguments for its adoption.
Why every team should install its offense in three days (and other political theories on coaching offense) | Smart Football
You'll get over it
Butthurt, it's what's for dinner.
Also, for the many plays, few plays debate, here is an example of the smaller version and arguments for its adoption.
Why every team should install its offense in three days (and other political theories on coaching offense) | Smart Football
Here is my issue with saying 99 and 89 are the same plays.
First the coverage dictactes the running back.
Also when you start running plays like 99 F Shoot X Motion Out. Your changing multiple routes and adding motion potentially.
This is not the same pass play imo. Maybe with changing one route, but not as you start to change 2 or 3 things.
Again 99 F Shoot X Motion Out compared to 89 (lets say that keeps RB in blocking) could actually change the oline coverage 9 to 8 which I agree there are limited oline blocking schemes, but it could also change the routes/assignments of 3 of the 5 eligible receivers.
That would be like saying that Y stick, X spot is a completely different play than Y stick. It's the exact same passing concept, you just add a slight wrinkle on the backside to effect the WLB.
What are you talking about with "oline coverage"? Are you talking about the oline blocking scheme? Oline's audible their blocking schemes all the time, that doesn't change the play. Even if the oline's blocking scheme call changes who is the hot wr or who has to stay in for pass protection, the route concept does not change. You are still reading it the same. The play still has the same rhythm for the QB, and the basic route structure and principles behind why that route structure works (oblique stretch, vertical stretch, 3 level concepts, triangle routes), are the still the same.