emainvol
Giver of Sexy
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 22,537
- Likes
- 20
Toledo vs La Tech
That doesn't count because it doesn't fit into the argument. Neither does the **** show that Saban inherited at LSU, which is why that point was ignored.
Let me give you a history lesson. Saban has coached 4 NCAA Football programs. Toledo, Michigan St., LSU and Alabama.
Go ahead and do your research, then get back to me when you have a damn clue.
Are you mentally handicapped? How was I having trouble keeping up when he couldn't figure out that I was talking about MSU and not Alabama? Please don't procreate.
Saban proved he could rebuild at Toledo. He proved he could rebuild at LSU. So, your argument is that a proven rebuilder showing at MSU that it can take time to rebuild, disproves that it can take time to rebuild?
Is that really the argument you are trying to make?
Neither of you are helping yourself make the argument that rebuilding time proves coaching acumen. And, for the record emain, it actually MAKES my argument for those able to follow the argument.
Can I get an "amen" from the choir?
Amen!!!
Even nick saTan would have to take at least 3 to 4 years to totally rebuild our Tennessee disaster after laMe kiffScum ran off so many talented players.
People forget that CDD was the recruiting coordinator under nick saTan at LSU and that CNS did keep CDD for 7 years as his assistant and CNS would never keep a bad coach on his staff when he can hire anyone he really wants.
CDD should get 4 years before any serious judgements are made that can set us back another 5 years or longer.
VFL...GBO!!!
So, for those of us that are following the debate, a coach that has proven at three stops that he can coach showed at one of the stops that rebuilding can take time. This helps you prove that Dooley sucks because he hasn't rebuilt yet... How?
Seems to me that you are cutting your own nose off as you try to make the case that Dooley sucks because he has not shown an immediate rebuild.
Dooley didn't make La Tech any better and he's had a very poor record here.
Outside of that, he's got one (1) coach on staff he hired 3 years ago. At best, he looks overwhelmed and learning on the job. At worst, he looks like his resume.
Or, he had the nards to take over two basement programs and showed similar results to that of the best coach in college football when he took over similar circumstances.
At worst, he looks overwhelmed and learning on the job. At best, he is coming out of a very dark part of UT history and we start seeing success. At worst, he will be given the shoeleather express. At best, he will be the coach that steered UT out of its darkest period in modern history.
I reserve the right to delay judgment until its appropriate time. If he proves to the "at best", I will stand in line to shake his hand and express my thanks as a UT fan.
Shalom to you my fellow fan. :hi: