Zimmerman Trial

I look forward to the State arguing that Trayvon was the one screaming and the reason it was him was b/c he saw Zimmerman's gun/Zimmerman pointed gun at him. I don't know about anyone else, but if I get a gun pulled on me in the dark, I'm not screaming anything - at most I would be begging the guy holding the gun on me for my life. I just have a hard time buying the argument that the normal reaction to seeing a gun, and having someone point it at you, is to scream for almost a full minute until you get shot. I just can't figure what the State's story for what happened that night will be because it has changed so much from their opening argument.

Nobody believes that. Even the prosecutors are not that stupid.

But and here is the big but.

Martins parents lied and it gave the prosecution no choice at that point.

The Martin parents will have to live with that for the rest of their lives.

A conviction could have been made in this case easily with the truth.
 
I look forward to the State arguing that Trayvon was the one screaming and the reason it was him was b/c he saw Zimmerman's gun/Zimmerman pointed gun at him. I don't know about anyone else, but if I get a gun pulled on me in the dark, I'm not screaming anything - at most I would be begging the guy holding the gun on me for my life. I just have a hard time buying the argument that the normal reaction to seeing a gun, and having someone point it at you, is to scream for almost a full minute until you get shot. I just can't figure what the State's story for what happened that night will be because it has changed so much from their opening argument.

I am neutral on this case. Most of my info on this case is what I have read on VN.

With that said. One thing I have learned over the years is one never knows how they would react to a situation until they are in a situation.
 
What decade are we living in?

Please use numbers.

We are living in the 10s.

But there is a difference in writing the colloquial term for a decade and writing a measure like time or distance. For instance, if your child is 17 years old he hasn't lived for 10s of years. If your child is 23 he has lived for 10s of years.
 
We are living in the 10s.

But there is a difference in writing the colloquial term for a decade and writing a measure like time or distance. For instance, if your child is 17 years old he hasn't lived for 10s of years. If your child is 23 he has lived for 10s of years.

Well how the would you describe 17?

Years of years?
 
We are living in the 10s.

But there is a difference in writing the colloquial term for a decade and writing a measure like time or distance. For instance, if your child is 17 years old he hasn't lived for 10s of years. If your child is 23 he has lived for 10s of years.

Did a tenn fan hack your account , I'm sensing some intelligence from the bammer
 
It's 17 years. To imply hundreds it would have to be greater than 200. Even then just watch the video. It wasn't that far from the road. But why are you so hung up on this?

Why?

Because Zimmerman said he was not following Martin.

And here is a biggie for all that say Martin should not have gone back....

Zimmerman turned back 1st.

Was he concerned about the address?
 
It's 17 years. To imply hundreds it would have to be greater than 200. Even then just watch the video. It wasn't that far from the road. But why are you so hung up on this?

He's hung up on it because he's demonstrably wrong and is trying like hell to save face about it. (This was exacerbated by actually betting on his observation) It's worse than listening to Clinton trying to talk about the word "is".

In truth the greater issue being lost is his trying to make a big deal about the distance involved from the street by watching his video. In HIS video one can clearly and easily see the area where GZ was parked a scant 40yd dash away. He took a bad argument and made it worse.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top