Why are we ignoring this?

#76
#76
They also didn't have Middle School when I was in school but let's not let that stop your rant. You are on a roll!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#77
#77
lawgator1 said:
Both sides exaggerate.

But the right does it more, and much more viciously.

I forgive them. They feel like they have to because the guy they nominated has no experience and no platform or record to run on other than platitudes and appeal to gingoistic nativism.

Right now, on the right, that sells more and gets you on tv more than does sober consideration of the complexities of the world.
Click to expand...

Would you hire the guy with no direct experience for the job, or the gal that has repeatedly failed at her job and lied about it but has experience?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#79
#79
lawgator1 said:
Both sides exaggerate.

But the right does it more, and much more viciously.

I forgive them. They feel like they have to because the guy they nominated has no experience and no platform or record to run on other than platitudes and appeal to gingoistic nativism.

Right now, on the right, that sells more and gets you on tv more than does sober consideration of the complexities of the world.
Click to expand...

Like I said, liberal lovefest. The circle is complete now that LG is here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#80
#80
82_VOL_83 said:
They also didn't have Middle School when I was in school but let's not let that stop your rant. You are on a roll!
Click to expand...

It would be nice to have a conversation with you about the topic at hand but you just deflect. Hell, you haven't even offered your opinion on this topic yet. Instead, you inject smart ass comments and fail to make a point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#81
#81
lawgator1 said:
Both sides exaggerate.

But the right does it more, and much more viciously.

I forgive them. They feel like they have to because the guy they nominated has no experience and no platform or record to run on other than platitudes and appeal to gingoistic nativism.

Right now, on the right, that sells more and gets you on tv more than does sober consideration of the complexities of the world.
Click to expand...

Seems familiar back in 2007. No experience, no record, just a one drop rule candidate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#82
#82
GoBigOrangeUT said:
It would be nice to have a conversation with you about the topic at hand but you just deflect. Hell, you haven't even offered your opinion on this topic yet. Instead, you inject smart ass comments and fail to make a point.
Click to expand...

It's hard being a thread moderator when you aren't one, isn't it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#83
#83
What I don't understand about this whole thing is that everyone automatically knows without a doubt what someone else meant by a certain statement. How the **** do you know what someone meant 100%? And the phrase "dog whistle" gets thrown around a lot. If this is a dog whistle for 2nd amendment people, how are all these pundits able to hear it? #notdefendingtrump
 
#86
#86
1972 Grad said:
I think that by saying what he did, and watching the resultant press coverage of same, he solidifies support from his voters, because he can point to the jumping to conclusions by the media, and unfairness of the coverage. The people who took offense aren't going to vote for him anyway.
Click to expand...

Then you're willfully blind to the realities. Trump is bleeding voters and the primary reason is because of his damn mouth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#88
#88
lawgator1 said:
Both sides exaggerate.

But the right does it more, and much more viciously.

I forgive them. They feel like they have to because the guy they nominated has no experience and no platform or record to run on other than platitudes and appeal to gingoistic nativism.

Right now, on the right, that sells more and gets you on tv more than does sober consideration of the complexities of the world.
Click to expand...

The right does it more?

But comments on the 2A and SC nominees is a call for assassination?

Who's exaggerating?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#90
#90
GoBigOrangeUT said:
It would be nice to have a conversation with you about the topic at hand but you just deflect. Hell, you haven't even offered your opinion on this topic yet. Instead, you inject smart ass comments and fail to make a point.
Click to expand...

I haven't quite figured out what topic you are discussing. Could it be your ineffective attempts at insulting everyone? Your constant BS is getting in the way of any topic you may be a part of.

I think HRC is a lying ****. I think the OP is just another liberal shill that thinks he has a brilliant idea but is actually a couple of days behind on his taking points. I think you are showing your ass. And I'm voting for Trump.

Did I miss anything?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#91
#91
82_VOL_83 said:
I haven't quite figured out what topic you are discussing. Could it be your ineffective attempts at insulting everyone? Your constant BS is getting in the way of any topic you may be a part of.

I think HRC is a lying ****. I think the OP is just another liberal shill that thinks he has a brilliant idea but is actually a couple of days behind on his taking points. I think you are showing your ass. And I'm voting for Trump.

Did I miss anything?
Click to expand...

Okay. We agree on the Hillary part. But you don't think Trump did anything wrong with his comments?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#93
#93
Hayezb said:
Would you hire the guy with no direct experience for the job, or the gal that has repeatedly failed at her job and lied about it but has experience?
Click to expand...

You know the answer to that question.
 
#95
#95
GoBigOrangeUT said:
Okay. We agree on the Hillary part. But you don't think Trump did anything wrong with his comments?
Click to expand...

Trumps problem is inserting words where they don't belong, or how he says things. One thing we can all agree on is he has no filter, and that is one reason why a lot of his republican colleagues won't support him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#100
#100
GoVols10 said:
Please explain why you feel that Trump condoning violence against another politician was nothing. At very least you should be asking "would a sane man make these comments?"
Click to expand...

Only a messed up, elite mind sees it the way you do sir. Why is it assumed by you and your liberal "friends" that people who support the 2nd amendment are gun nuts who will fly off the damned handle and shoot someone even if that's what Trump meant (and clearly he did not).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top