Why are we ignoring this?

#53
#53
I'm sorry but I am not inclined to take the word of a man who has been caught in so many lies in the past. Insinuating or even making remarks close to Insinuating the harm of another candidate is something we can not overlook in good conscious.

Please apply the same measuring stick to the other candidate who hinted about the same for Barack Obama in 2008.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#54
#54
I'd be fine with him being removed from the ticket but I missed seeing a remark like that from him.

If that happens, who do the Republicans choose? Anything at this point would be an improvement.

Can the RNC withdraw their nomination at this point?
 
#56
#56
I'm not a frequent poster, however I am a longtime reader. In this forum I have seen 6 threads alone on the "email scandal." Yet we have a man running for president that has threatened/condoned violence against another member of a major party. Now granted this discussion may be buried deep in another thread,but at what point does it stop? At what point do people stop making excuses for this madman, this demagogue? When do people get their head out of the sand and realize this election is much more than emails? When do people realize we are on the verge of electing a possible sociopath to the highest most respected office in the land.
I'll hop off my soapbox now and listen.

Our country is so ****ing hopeless.

What's a bigger issue here?

Donald Trump making rude and arrogant comments

or

Hillary Clinton.. you know, the one that knowingly set up an illegal private email server in the basement of her own home to conduct government business and then repeatedly lie about it. She lied to the American people and the FBI and got nothing for it. Nothing. You would never be seen from again if you did that.

"Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails that were sent or received, was that true?"

"That's not true"

"Secretary Clinton said she did not email any classified material, was that true?"

"There was classified material emailed"

"Secretary Clinton said she used just one device, was that true?"

"She used multiple devices during her term as Secretary of State"

"Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were turned over to the State Department, was that true?"

"No, we found work related emails, thousands that were not returned"

"Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account, was that true?"

"There's no doubt that work related emails were removed electronically from the system"

Does it not upset you at all that she is treated so differently?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#58
#58
Oh sorry, didn't realize this was a liberal love in. I'll take my consecutive God, guns, and guts elsewhere.

Once again, idiotic logic. If you call out a conservative for being stupid, you're automatically a liberal. Did you graduate middle school?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#66
#66
Once again, idiotic logic. If you call out a conservative for being stupid, you're automatically a liberal. Did you graduate middle school?

And if you read that as me calling you a liberal then I must be closer to the truth than you realize. Everything isn't about you Nancy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#67
#67
I've said various times that Hillary is a piece of ****. I think she at the very least should be removed from her position and at the most imprisoned.

Removing her from running for office would help restore a little faith the people are missing in this country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#69
#69
Hillary is openly going around saying the FBI claimed she was being truthful when they repeatedly said she lied.

Why isn't the FBI sticking up for itself?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#70
#70
Removing her from running for office would help restore a little faith the people are missing in this country.

Maybe so, but very unlikely with the current administration persuading the Justice dept. to look the other way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#73
#73
Both sides exaggerate.

But the right does it more, and much more viciously.

I forgive them. They feel like they have to because the guy they nominated has no experience and no platform or record to run on other than platitudes and appeal to gingoistic nativism.

Right now, on the right, that sells more and gets you on tv more than does sober consideration of the complexities of the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#74
#74
Maybe so, but very unlikely with the current administration persuading the Justice dept. to look the other way.

Both parties are ****ing up, but if the Dems would grow a pair they have all the dirt in the world to use against Clinton and force her out of running. Then they call up a respectable candidate that would walk away with the election.

Repubs can't do that to Trump, right now at least, because all he's done is say mean things. It would be a nightmare if they forced him out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#75
#75
Trump says so many idiotic, bigoted, nonsensical things so often that it has become commonplace on the stump, consequently, we are becoming immune to his stupidity. He should really just bow out of the race before he embarrasses himself and the Republican Party any further.

I haven't seen Donald fall down any steps, or need assistance have you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top