I've heard the "Mustang" described as "time consuming" to teach. We don't have the luxury of time.One likely problem with the above, that's beyond my Xs and Os understanding, would be the demands on the offensive line. Would an option-style mustang package require different techniques or blocking schemes?
I'm guessing that the OC would initially want to design option plays that utilize blocking schemes that the O-linemen are already practicing. But it might be far more complicated than that. I wouldn't know...
I may have used a technical term too generically. Just for clarity, by "Mustang" I simply mean any offense in which the QB is the primary ball carrier, with the option to pass or pitch, and taking what the defense allows rather than executing an elaborate scheme to create yardage.I've heard the "Mustang" described as "time consuming" to teach. We don't have the luxury of time.
Heupel needs to find someone who can step in, execute a few core plays really well, is cool headed and can learn quickly.
Shooting for the moon in April isn't an option unless we've been working on someone and Nico leaving makes us more attractive.
Steady and heady..... like Josh Dobbs has stepped in for NFL teams. I'd sacrifice athleticism for brains.
There will be some walk-on QB's that are not currently showing on roster. We had 5 QB's last year on hte official roster. Nico, Merck, Moore, Shuler and Damron. One quit, one graduated, one transferred to SF Austin. We will always have a walk-on on or two for scout squads and emergency contingency that will eventually show on the roster. The Damron kid had offers from KY, EKU, MTSU, ETSU, but elected to go PWO with UT. Was always too small for SEC if he would have been good enough. Should have went on with one of the more realistic offers at the time.Looking at the utsports roster, we have two QBs apparently. It doesn't even list any "no name walk on." I have no idea if anyone else played in the O&W except Merk and G-Mac.
If there's a halfway decent HS QB on campus, he might get a snap or two in Neyland in the final seconds of a 4th Q if he walks on.
In reality, we need someone. If Sellers would portal up, commit to UCF or somewhere, then flip to UT...... I wouldn't mind. Not that I'd advocate tampering and shenanigans like that.
In that case just go get the QB of the day from Mount Union or Wisconsin Whitewater.I haven't had time to read the thread, so apologies if already posted:
IF our immediate need is a plug & play QB, should the first two get injured...
and if that incoming QB is going to be well behind the others in learning the Heupel offense...
why not spend our money on a runner/passer who would excel in a simple "mustang package" option style of offense?
1) He can have immediate utility as our 2-point conversion package, so that he's contributing from game one.
2) That conversion package has to be installed anyway, so it wouldn't require practice time that wasn't already allocated for that.
3) If that conversion package were based on option reads, it would then have the flexibility to be expanded into a full set of downs package that could serve in an in-game emergency situation.
4) A player with those skills might also serve as depth at other positions, given time to learn over the course of the season.
For this approach, I'd look for a speedy, elusive option QB who's currently playing at a small-to-mid major college because he's deemed too small to take the punishment of a full career in the SEC. I think those guys are out there, and would jump at the chance to display their talents on the big stage, and earn an amount of NIL that's probably unavailable to them where they are.
Not necessarily. Guard may pull a little more often. But, less drop back pass protection.One likely problem with the above, that's beyond my Xs and Os understanding, would be the demands on the offensive line. Would an option-style mustang package require different techniques or blocking schemes?
I'm guessing that the OC would initially want to design option plays that utilize blocking schemes that the O-linemen are already practicing. But it might be far more complicated than that. I wouldn't know...
I was looking at the kid, Byrum Brown, at USF.Sports illustrated said Tennessee is doing it's due diligence on Dylan Rizk from UCF he has the talent for sure. I say bring him in have a qb battle.
I agree, but all three competitions seem to be favoring the younger players on the eoster. If that is the case, the older players may not get that year.Yeah but one year starting at any of those doth a pro career make. If I was at a top 10 blueblood, and new the senior year was mine, I'd pay my dues for that one season.
I suspect Joe Burrow, a nearly hometown Ohio boy, and Quinn Ewers could've stayed at Ohio State and stood a great chance of starting as a senior, if not before, but that's not how the really elite guys seem to see it these days.Yeah but one year starting at any of those doth a pro career make. If I was at a top 10 blueblood, and new the senior year was mine, I'd pay my dues for that one season.
100%, whoever it is doesnt have to be a 6'6 gunslinger, go find somebody who processes fast and has a little moxy to them like a Kellen Moore or Heupel himself in college lol. Or someone like Pavia, crafty and grittyI've heard the "Mustang" described as "time consuming" to teach. We don't have the luxury of time.
Heupel needs to find someone who can step in, execute a few core plays really well, is cool headed and can learn quickly.
Shooting for the moon in April isn't an option unless we've been working on someone and Nico leaving makes us more attractive.
Steady and heady..... like Josh Dobbs has stepped in for NFL teams. I'd sacrifice athleticism for brains.