FayetteVol1
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2013
- Messages
- 16
- Likes
- 10
With a negative rape kit, can you still have a sexual battery case?
I am afraid UT might be in a double jeopardy situation here. They could get sued by the player if not allowed to play and hit up for an EEOC infraction and significant fines if he is allowed to play.
There has to be more information here that is not being discussed. I wonder if there was some kind of intermediary that was involved that could implicate either the university or athletic department. That would make for a very tense situation all around.
Good point.
My concern is over the defense sharing medical records with the University. As an attorney, I wouldn't do that absent written consent from the alleged Victim or her attorney, or unless the University had subpoenaed the records (that is if the University's judicial board has subpoena power, which I kind of doubt).
Perhaps Von's attorney simply "told" the University that the results came back negative, rather than actually sharing the physical medical results.
There is no such thing as a negative rape kit. There may be a lack of findings but from the accused perspective the best it shows is that there is no biological evidence and no sign of trauma. It doesn't mean that an act did not occur.
There is a way to make this simpler for you. Just assume Von will not be playing this season until you hear differently.
There is no such thing as a negative rape kit. There may be a lack of findings but from the accused perspective the best it shows is that there is no biological evidence and no sign of trauma. It doesn't mean that an act did not occur.
There is absolutely no precedent for suspending someone from a public institution for a legal investigation in which there is no physical evidence. Getting reinstated to the football team is another matter. Hopefully the DA will make a decision soon with all the information they have.
You are flat out wrong. He is suspended most likely because of Title IX. There has been a hearing on the issue. There is no need for physical evidence and in fact there would probably not be any physical evidence. The university is under an obligation to provide a safe learning environment and if the accuser convinces the hearing board that they do not feel safe, the university ios perfectly within its rights to preclude a student from campus for all purposes.
You are flat out wrong. He is suspended most likely because of Title IX. There has been a hearing on the issue. There is no need for physical evidence and in fact there would probably not be any physical evidence. The university is under an obligation to provide a safe learning environment and if the accuser convinces the hearing board that they do not feel safe, the university ios perfectly within its rights to preclude a student from campus for all purposes.
This attitude is what Title IX is designed to prevent. This creates a hostile environment and is why Title IX exists.
And where did Carilli go to school? I'm betting Syracuse or Michigan.
He's draft eligible after this year regardless of whether he plays or not. He'd likely be gone to the NFL if he played, and he'll likely go if he doesn't play.
Well, it didn't work. It doesn't make a bit of difference either since he's not playing this year anyway. A case like this shouldn't have been dragged out this long and everyone knows it including his lawyer. Every bit of evidence and things we've learned all point to Von being innocent and just being screwed. Title IX isn't going to stop that lying whore from getting the karma that's coming to her. You can toss out Title IX comments all you want but it's not going to change a damn thing.
this whole deal is a joke honestly.
