Vols and Jancek part ways! (official)

Did UT Treat Jancek Unfairly?

  • Total voters
    0
#403
#403
VOLorNuttin said:
Rushing only 3 on the play + the soft coverage = disaster. I don't know why DC's do that BS on critical downs. It is such a low percentage call.

Watch great defenses in the NFL. They usually don't go into prevent mode, but instead blitz, to apply overwhelming pressure in 3rd and 4th and long situations. When watching the Titans' last game this week, you could see them blitz EVERY time in that situation.

Not saying we should have blitzed on that play, but at least 4 down linemen. Janzek also kept his starters out on the field for far too many snaps and didn't do anything to change it. Even Barnett needs some rest now and then, and Janzek almost never gave him any
Click to expand...

I don't think spying the Qb was particularly smart, but they held a back in to help block. I think their 6 would have had no trouble with a 4 man rush or even 1 blitzer they would have had numbers.

The issue with 4th and 14 was our Nickel corner. He widened for NO reason whatsoever. Their #2 receiver went vertical...he carried him vertical and passed him off to the safety....no problem so far. After passing him off, he should sit in the zone and wait for the next route to show. He doesn't. He loses his mind and widens to absolutely nothing. UF's #1 receiver then runs a dig right behind him and sits right in the spot he vacated. If he doesn't widen, he is sitting right there and there is no throw. Who knows, then Grier might try to scramble with no one to throw to right into the waiting arms of our "spy"
 
#404
#404
Risky move in my opinion. I'm never a fan of shaking things up when all is going well.. I think there was some conflict between CBJ and Jancek that we aren't aware of. We'll see what kind of hire Butch makes and won't really know if it was a good move until this time next year.
 
#405
#405
Well, l thank him for getting the defense to step up, but now we will find out who CBJ has to replace him- better be a solid, top notch DC
 
#406
#406
Volstate said:
Classy tweet? Guy is self absorbed. The truth of the matter is he was way too passive in dialing up blitzes when he needed to and was awful at situational defensive calls. Jancek probably single handedly cost us a trip the SEC Championship. Great guy, terrible defensive coordinator. I wish him luck wherever he goes and a big :good!: to Butch Jones for having the jewels for calling him out and ridding us of the problem. We have business to tend to in 2016...no scrubs allowed :hi:
Click to expand...

Jancek is the only coach out there that doesn't blitz 6 on 4th and 15 or he doesn't blitz on passing downs.
 
#407
#407
I guess the only thing that makes sense is that Jancek didn't command (in CBJ's opinion) the kind of raise that would justify the kind of raises he needs to give in order to retain certain other assistants. I really don't like rocking the boat at this point in time... just doesn't add up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#408
#408
My one complaint about Jancek is his pass coverages were way too soft in key situations and was either afraid to blitz or had ineffective blitz packages. Other than that, I thought he did a solid job here overall.
 
#410
#410
VOLorNuttin said:
Rushing only 3 on the play + the soft coverage = disaster. I don't know why DC's do that BS on critical downs. It is such a low percentage call.

Watch great defenses in the NFL. They usually don't go into prevent mode, but instead blitz, to apply overwhelming pressure in 3rd and 4th and long situations. When watching the Titans' last game this week, you could see them blitz EVERY time in that situation.

Not saying we should have blitzed on that play, but at least 4 down linemen. Janzek also kept his starters out on the field for far too many snaps and didn't do anything to change it. Even Barnett needs some rest now and then, and Janzek almost never gave him any
Click to expand...

It is worse than just rushing three. The fourth defender on the line of scrimmage was essentially schemed out of the play because he was "spying" Grier. Why was there a "spy" on Grier with 14 yards to make?
 
Last edited:
#411
#411
DownTheField said:
I guess the only thing that makes sense is that Jancek didn't command (in CBJ's opinion) the kind of raise that would justify the kind of raises he needs to give in order to retain certain other assistants. I really don't like rocking the boat at this point in time... just doesn't add up.
Click to expand...

If one is to believe some of what's being passed along, this wasn't just about onfield results.
 
#412
#412
DownTheField said:
I guess the only thing that makes sense is that Jancek didn't command (in CBJ's opinion) the kind of raise that would justify the kind of raises he needs to give in order to retain certain other assistants. I really don't like rocking the boat at this point in time... just doesn't add up.
Click to expand...

Lot of crazy rumors over on SEC Rants right now saying this was a personal issue between CJJ and CBJ. One person claims to know the Janceck family very well and says this has to do with an improper relationship between CJJ and a younger woman that he keeps bringing around the program. Supposedly CBJ told him to stop as some recruits parents were troubled by the relationship. No clue if there is any truth to it but several "people in the know" are discussing it on that site.
 
#413
#413
hooperj75 said:
Lot of crazy rumors over on SEC Rants right now saying this was a personal issue between CJJ and CBJ. One person claims to know the Janceck family very well and says this has to do with an improper relationship between CJJ and a younger woman that he keeps bringing around the program. Supposedly CBJ told him to stop as some recruits parents were troubled by the relationship. No clue if there is any truth to it but several "people in the know" are discussing it on that site.
Click to expand...

Apparently same info in a nuked VQ thread earlier.
 
#416
#416
Carlitovol said:
BBC.. Bring Back Chief !
Click to expand...

I was at UT when the Chief was playing and it would be great for us to bring him home. However, it's not very realistic with him scheduled to make $1.55 million base salary in 2016. There is also the matter of a buyout.
 
#423
#423
DownTheField said:
The "girlfriend" speculation probably isn't true.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I just don't see that one at all. Got some young thing on the side that he's bringing around the facilities? The very high profile facilities? Where his son is all the time? Makes zero sense. I'm calling BS.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top