TrumPutinGate

Paul Manafort just hired a crisis communications firm. He is also now wanted for questioning in Ukraine.
 

Attachments

  • C7ez6MNXUAAdx5w.jpg
    C7ez6MNXUAAdx5w.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 1
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Paul Manafort just hired a crisis communications firm. He is also now wanted for questioning in Ukraine.

Nothing to see here... Per Sean Spicer yesterday, Manafort played a limited role (campaign manager during the convention) for a limited time (over 4 months). There are no ties between Trump and Russia - this is all just snowflake, liberal butthurt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
One point of considerable interest (and concern) to all of us regardless of political slant: Given that the FBI withheld the fact that it was conducting a formal investigation into potential Trump/Russian collusion prior to the election, but NOW is letting this cat out of the bag suggests that evidence supporting such collusion has INCREASED since that time. Think about that for just a second. This fact, combined with Comey's otherwise terse responses, does earn the dubious "grey skies over the white house" comments emanating from Monday's hearing.

The Donald's mantra has always been "win at all costs". Would that actually include him knowingly having his campaign staff secretly working with one of our nation's greatest enemies to win the election? Honestly, I just can't bring myself to believe that even a lying, principal-devoid Trump would do this IF he believed that Russia was an "enemy of the state". BUT, here's the catch: Trump doesn't consider Russia an enemy. In fact, he admires Putin more than Obama! He even said so.

So, by The Donald's logic, he would view any effort to work with our "friends" in Russia to bring all of the damaging DNC emails to the public light simply as that - bringing the "truth" to light. No harm, no foul, right? In fact, he would probably argue that we should THANK HIM for his efforts to help his good buddies at Wikileaks get all this information about Clinton's "corruption" out in public.

Sadly, I fear it's no stretch of the imagination to view this scenario as being completely realistic and possible.

If true, it would be the greatest political scandel in our nation's history, without doubt, and I can't even fathom what effects this would have on our system.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong.
 
Last edited:
OuterBanksVol said:
One point of considerable interest (and concern) to all of us regardless of political slant: Given that the FBI withheld the fact that it was conducting a formal investigation into potential Trump/Russian collusion prior to the election, but NOW is letting this cat out of the bag suggests that evidence supporting such collusion has INCREASED since that time. Think about that for just a second. This fact, combined with Comey's otherwise terse responses, does earn the dubious "grey skies over the white house" comments emanating from Monday's hearing.

The Donald's mantra has always been "win at all costs". Would that actually include him knowingly having his campaign staff secretly working with one of our nation's greatest enemies to win the election? Honestly, I just can't bring myself to believe that even a lying, principal-devoid Trump would do this IF he believed that Russia was an "enemy of the state". BUT, here's the catch: Trump doesn't consider Russia an enemy. In fact, he admires Putin more than Obama! He even said so.

So, by The Donald's logic, he would view any effort to work with our "friends" in Russia to bring all of the damaging DNC emails to the public light simply as that - bringing the "truth" to light. No harm, no foul, right? In fact, he would probably argue that we should THANK HIM for his efforts to help his good buddies at Wikileaks get all this information about Clinton's "corruption" out in public.

Sadly, I fear it's no stretch of the imagination to view this scenario as being completely realistic and possible.

If true, it would be the greatest political scandel in our nation's history, without doubt, and I can't even fathom what effects this would have on our system.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong.

No you don't. You want it to be so.
Your entire tome screams so.
 
Last edited:
Also more evidence emerges that Trumpers were being paid by Russians and talking with Russian agents.

Hold on while I put on my shocked face.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
80 times Trump talked about Putin

Since 2013 — when Trump’s Miss Universe pageant was held in Moscow — Trump has at least nine times claimed to have spoken to, met, or made contact with Putin. But as the 2016 campaign wore on and his statements on Putin began to attract more scrutiny, Trump changed course, denying having ever met the Russian president.

“I never met Putin,” Trump said at a July 2016 news conference. “I don’t know who Putin is. He said one nice thing about me. He said I'm a genius. I said thank you very much to the newspaper and that was the end of it. I never met Putin.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

VN Store

Back
Top