Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 45,022
- Likes
- 92,242
Yeah, but for you beta cuck libs, “your side did it too” is a win. You’re always just playing to be almost as good as the president of peace and global stability.Stupidity and partisan hackery isn’t limited to Trump.
Seems pretty balanced to me.
He interviewed people who said they’ve never witnessed any children there as well as claiming their funding is publicly available. Local officials claim they found no wrongdoing even though MN has a few other similar scandals going.He went to a bunch of places that were closed, non-operational or actually did have people in them and claimed they were fake daycares, with no one ever finding evidence to back up what he said (like everything else he says). He's an idiot. I hate to tell you how putting this much stock in YouTube makes you look
It was an obviously volatile situation before this all happened. It’s easy to predict it was going to escalate. Which is why they should have sent Homan from day 1 instead of that idiot BovinoYes, but the ICE response and the agitators are kind of creating each other. Hopefully DHS figures out the paramilitary look isn’t the way.
Because when I want knowledgeable evaluations of the competency of law enforcement officers for immigration, I turn to NBA head coaches.Doc Rivers Stands by Comments Accusing ICE of ‘Straight Up Murder’
View attachment 811866
Milwaukee Bucks head coach Doc Rivers revealed that he was standing by his criticism of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), stating that the “training of ICE is horrible.”
Before the game between the Milwaukee Bucks and the Boston Celtics, Rivers was asked by OutKick reporter Dan Zaksheske about his previous comments calling the fatal shooting of Renee Good “straight up murder.”
“A few weeks ago, you said the shooting of Renee Good in Minnesota was a ‘straight-up murder,’ and you called the broader ICE situation a travesty,” Zaksheske asked. “Now that some time has passed, do you still stand by those words, and when you said murder, can you explain if you meant that in the legal sense or as a moral condemnation?
“Both,” Rivers responded. “And, I don’t change that at all.”
OutKick reported that Rivers also claimed that NBA star Hakeem Olajuwon “could have been taken off the streets” by ICE, and contended that Border Czar Tom Homan “has said that they’re targeting people by their color.”:
He showed up to "expose a daycare" on a SaturdayHe interviewed people who said they’ve never witnessed any children there as well as claiming their funding is publicly available. Local officials claim they found no wrongdoing even though MN has a few other similar scandals going.
Trump admin is investigating and Walz even says he will help.
Now there’s more deportations.
I’m ok with however you view me.

ICE is a victimRight local LEOS. Not ice which is what I was referring to in your post..where you claimed the the victim (ice) of the stalking or harrassing should arrest them stalkers....which they legally cannot do in a state level charge.
Oh and ICE can absolutely arrest anyone interfering with them executing their duties. But just following them around doesn’t pass the bar of interference soooooooooRight local LEOS. Not ice which is what I was referring to in your post..where you claimed the the victim (ice) of the stalking or harrassing should arrest them stalkers....which they legally cannot do in a state level charge.
I literally was in Minneapolis 2 months ago and can vividly remember thinking “Huh… Kind of random” a lot. If you’re in Texas and see a Hispanic influence or in Hawaii and see things written in Japanese it makes sense. There’s probably a good reason for Somalians in Minnesota, but…
Interfering yes... Stalking is a state level crime unless it can't be proven they crossed state lines to do it.. But we won't agree... Because I'm not responding with my feelings, I'm refering to the law and the application... Your caught in your feelings again just like with earlier in the thread... Enjoy retirement... You can have they let word.Oh and ICE can absolutely arrest anyone interfering with them executing their duties. But just following them around doesn’t pass the bar of interference sooooooooo
He showed up to "expose a daycare" on a Saturday
Yeah the admin went to Minnesota to round up illegal Somalis, and ended up chasing Hispanic people and shooting American citizens instead. Close enough, right?
View attachment 811902
You completely misrepresented the situations and mis applied the statute. Just following around the agents doesn’t pass the bar on the state statute provided. That’s your fault not mine.Interfering yes... Stalking is a state level crime unless it can't be proven they crossed state lines to do it.. But we won't agree... Because I'm not responding with my feelings, I'm refering to the law and the application... Your caught in your feelings again just like with earlier in the thread... Enjoy retirement... You can have they let word.
Before this, he was amplifying debunked things like Haitians eating pets and the UK having 40,000 Muslims on terror watchlists. He is mostly a conspiracy idiot and "asking people in the neighborhood" doesn't tell you very much about a daycare that only a handful of people would have entered anyway. The fraud case was already open.Lord these gotcha posts are tiring. I’m not a hardcore supporter of the kid, I’d never heard of him before this. He was asking about the daycare to different people in the neighborhood according to social media.
And would it be ok if ICE only deported white people?
There is a constitutional right to record police and other government officials performing their duties in public, protected by the First Amendment. But that right doesn’t immunize conduct that goes beyond passive recording — such as:You completely misrepresented the situations and mis applied the statute. Just following around the agents doesn’t pass the bar on the state statute provided. That’s your fault not mine.
Nothing you’ve stated here supports the stalking claim. Some of it is just wishful interpretation on your part.There is a constitutional right to record police and other government officials performing their duties in public, protected by the First Amendment. But that right doesn’t immunize conduct that goes beyond passive recording — such as:
repeatedly following a particular individual over time,
pursuing them to multiple locations, and
engaging in conduct that would reasonably lead them to feel intimidated or harassed —
which is precisely what Minnesota’s stalking statute covers.
Here ya go.. This is how the law can be applied.....If you like the law fine... But it's the law...
Good luck
