W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 158,909
- Likes
- 428,987
This is fair and relevant for Charlie Kirk too. The deification just hadn't seemed that pervasive here to me but I acknowledge that I've seen itSerious question: Is that what it is, or is it a response to the post-mortem deification narrative? It rings kind of hollow to enter something into evidence and then cry when it's discussed by the opposing counsel.
Laken Riley's killer was was found guilty at trial and imprisoned.No sympathy for the previous victims that led to this. Instead you call it stupid. Maybe the same energy on protestors believing they can do whatever they want with no consequences.
Those victims are why ICE is across the US picking up illegals. It’s a chain reaction that could have been avoided had the left secured the border. Pretti isn’t political fodder?No one ever suggested the previous victims had it coming or celebrated their deaths like hjeaglevol did here. Seems like the previous victims are mostly used as political fodder to defend ICE when it kills more people
You mean the illegal was found at trail and imprisoned.Laken Riley's killer was was found guilty at trial and imprisoned.
I take it you support the same for Alex Pretti's killer?
Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota isn't because of Laken Riley, if anything it's because the government wanted to round up Somalis after the fraud story. (Although this somewhat illustrates the issues with but-for cause that I referenced above)Those victims are why ICE is across the US picking up illegals. It’s a chain reaction that could have been avoided had the left secured the border. Pretti isn’t political fodder?
A pet peeve of mine are people who (1) abuse vocabulary and concepts and (2) twist people's statements, to (a) put words in their mouths and (b) create straw men that are more easily attacked while also framing the person who said it in as negative a way as possible. It's rampant on here. Again, I won't infer motives. We can just use Hanlon's Razor.This may be nitpicking and I understand your overall point, but using but-for cause to establish culpability gets dicey IMO. Like, Pretti wouldn't have been killed if not for the woman he tried to help, so is she culpable? Would people have fallen in different ways if they were wearing different boots and clothes? To me, there's always a LONG list of "this wouldn't have happened if not for _______" and people often ignore 95% of them and choose one.
That's why the law generally prefers proximate cause. Again, not saying it changes anything about the example you gave, but people using the specific "wouldn't have happened but for _____" argument is a pet peeve of mine
You mean the illegal was found at trail and imprisoned.
But yes. And if he’s/they are found not guilty I expect you to say justice was served in the eyes of the law. It bothers you that conservatives have spoke out against the shooting. Missed your Riley post condemning illegals killing. Got a little fake rage in your beard.
This is fair and relevant for Charlie Kirk too. The deification just hadn't seemed that pervasive here to me but I acknowledge that I've seen it
I'm glad you are here to remind all of us this fact.![]()
It was absolutely relevant to his death. If his hobby had been crocheting instead of watching ICE-Stalking Signal channels and going to ICE operations armed, he would be alive right now."Facts" that aren't in any way relevant to the topic of his death
I don't blame them, the post-murder character assassination routine is both very tired and very irritating
Why’s that. I stated I was for those being held accountable or exonerated. I know thats confusing for you gotcha attempt mind. So pencil you in for coming back to the board to say justice was served if they get off? If we are discussing hypocrisy. Can you show me the post where you condemned the Riley deaths? Would help soften your fake rage this week.Careful now, you're setting yourself up to have to embrace hypocrisy at a later date.
Nevermind, forgot whom I was responding to.
Cute I guess?https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...unlawful-employment-aliens-criminal-penalties
Here you go, you want them gone -> nice and easy. You're welcome, but its not going to happen as the goal is to put on shows and not actually accomplish anything.
ICE enforcement would be the least of their concerns, but I guess we can watch the people watching the show for entertainment.
![]()
