Too much ice

#9,004
#9,004
Orange_Crush said:
No. I was definitely telling you to piss off. Kick rocks. Go waste someone else's time. Feel free to envision any synonymous phrase and take it to heart.
Click to expand...
Sure. Now go read the post where I said I’ve got close to 40 years working in video and see no obvious morphological transformations. They just aren’t there without an actual detailed analysis like pulling the images into a tool like Matlab and doing an overlay or difference image and detecting morphing errors. You for some reason ignored that post. I’ll go take that piss now.
 
#9,006
#9,006
Orange_Crush said:
I can see I need to clarify for the stupid among us. I'll happily do so.



Is that clear enough for the mouth breathers among us?
Click to expand...

EZp3trWXQAEUD6N.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and n_huffhines
#9,008
#9,008
Delmar said:
Yep. Good luck with that. News sources and most people on both sides are chock full of agendas and not to be taken seriously or without at least one million grains of salt.

Heard a comedian say this one time: “Only my mama loves me but she could be
bull 💩 in’ too.” Trust but verify before you believe it.
Click to expand...
🤣😂🤣
 
#9,009
#9,009
NorthDallas40 said:
Sure. No go read the post where I said I’ve got close to 40 years working in video and see no obvious morphological transformations. They just aren’t there without an actual detailed analysis like pulling the images into a tool like Matlab and doing an overlay or difference image and detecting morning errors. You for some reason ignored that post. I’ll go take that piss now.
Click to expand...
This doesn't look like pissing off to me.

While you're gone, take the time to look at the number of times I said "If they did...", and then criticized the MSM if that's what they indeed did. But you took all of that to repeatedly claim that I was using it to attack Pretti, which could not be further from the truth. Maybe I was completely wrong about the photos. That's why I said, "If they did indeed..." But that's beside the point. You weren't trying to pillow-fight "beat me up" for being wrong about a photo. You were serious-pillow-fighting about Pretti and attributing things to me that were not in the posts, and were not my intentions.

So, I'll repeat myself, Slugger. Piss off. I will give you no more of my time on this. If this was all just an exercise to accuse me of thing I wasn't doing, just to work in an excuse to flex on your video expertise, then you can doubly piss off and stay gone.
 
#9,013
#9,013
Orange_Crush said:
This doesn't look like pissing off to me.

While you're gone, take the time to look at the number of times I said "If they did...", and then criticized the MSM if that's what they indeed did. But you took all of that to repeatedly claim that I was using it to attack Pretti, which could not be further from the truth. Maybe I was completely wrong about the photos. That's why I said, "If they did indeed..." But that's beside the point. You weren't trying to pillow-fight "beat me up" for being wrong about a photo. You were serious-pillow-fighting about Pretti and attributing things to me that were not in the posts, and were not my intentions.

So, I'll repeat myself, Slugger. Piss off. I will give you no more of my time on this. If this was all just an exercise to accuse me of thing I wasn't doing, just to work in an excuse to flex on your video expertise, then you can doubly piss off and stay gone.
Click to expand...
The “if they did …” followed by more novels emphasizing how important whatever the topic is also rings hollow. For me I’d rather prove they did before stressing the narrative.

The video expertise is relevant because I actually did blow up and examine the images to try and see what you are claiming. I just didn’t see it without a more detailed analysis which I outlined how I would do it. It just isn’t as obvious as the claim for me.

Finally I am not trying to agitate you. I don’t accept your assertion. We disagree. That’s all. And I don’t want to agitate you further. If you reply with some other expansion though I’m probably gonna reply to that OC. But again we just disagree with the whole premise you are starting from. I do not see any ill intent on the Pretti images by MSM. Have a great day 👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
#9,015
#9,015
NorthDallas40 said:
...

Finally I am not trying to agitate you. I don’t accept your assertion. We disagree. That’s all. And I don’t want to agitate you further. If you reply with some other expansion though I’m probably gonna reply to that OC. But again we just disagree with the whole premise you are starting from. I do not see any ill intent on the Pretti images by MSM. Have a great day 👍
Click to expand...
That is not all. Below is merely one example of your horse****, and proof that your criticisms were not "I'm smarter than you about video." You were making very specific accusations. Don't try to win a fight now that you weren't having then, Slugger. That's what's disingenuous.

NorthDallas40 said:
... It’s a really stupid narrative and you going “no I’m not attacking the victim I’m attacking the media” is a completely disingenuous denial
Click to expand...

Please do an internet search to figure out what pissing off looks like. Of all the "offs" I've seen today, this is the least "pissing" among them.
 
#9,016
#9,016
Orange_Crush said:
That is not all. Below is merely one example of your horse****, and proof that your criticisms were not "I'm smarter than you about video." You were making very specific accusations. Don't try to win a fight now that you weren't having then, Slugger. That's what's disingenuous.



Please do an internet search to figure out what pissing off looks like. Of all the "offs" I've seen today, this is the least "pissing" among them.
Click to expand...
I’ve already taken my morning piss thanks. On the part of my post you quoted I was overzealous I agree. I made a post where I had taken that approach on a couple of friends this morning and yeah that were absolutely denigrating the victim as far as I’m concerned. And I did overly that impression on you. That was wrong I apologize.

Now on your assertion this is an MSM attempt to form a narrative I’ve made several posts on why I simply don’t see it in the Pretti images.
 
#9,017
#9,017
BeardedVol said:
Thanks for letting us know that you don't know how a 'Google Image Search' works.
Click to expand...
That’s concerning. I touch the picture it goes to the Twitter link. You actually admitted searching this out on a google search. Thanks for letting us know, well some of us already had you pegged.
 
Last edited:
#9,023
#9,023
BeardedVol said:
It's not him. What makes it relevant, is that plays into the administrations attempt to vilify Alex Pretti by tapping into prejudice of the republican base to reinforce the outright lie that they told of him being a "domestic terrorist" which is a lot easier pill for MAGA to swallow if they believe he is trans.
Click to expand...
It’s still a distraction that isn’t worth fighting.
My only answer to any accusation is “does that make it ok to shoot an unarmed person in the back hitting him 3 out of 10 shots?”

If he was a criminal, he didn’t deserve to die.
If he was a saint, he didn’t deserve to die.

Justice should be blind on this
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77, KptVFL, VolsAgainstTheWorld15 and 4 others
#9,024
#9,024
Orangeslice13 said:
It’s still a distraction that isn’t worth fighting.
My only answer to any accusation is “does that make it ok to shoot an unarmed person in the back hitting him 3 out of 10 shots?”

If he was a criminal, he didn’t deserve to die.
If he was a saint, he didn’t deserve to die.

Justice should be blind on this
Click to expand...
Did they really only hit him 3 out of 10? From point blank range? Ok those MFers need to be disarmed now and never allowed in public again as an armed federal agent
 
  • Like
Reactions: 825VOL, EasternVol, DuckInAPen and 2 others
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top