Too much ice

[Majors]

Because none show him being struck. Frame by frame shows both feet outside the path of her car. The first shot as she is creeping away. Now the 2nd shot was thru her window, the 3rd shot as he was running to keep up. So tell me 88 was the last 2 shots to prevent him from being run over or to kill her?

Does he have to be struck to validate her using her car to run him over? Especially when her wife is saying “drive, drive, drive.”

 

[Vol8188]

Because none show him being struck. Frame by frame shows both feet outside the path of her car. The first shot as she is creeping away. Now the 2nd shot was thru her window, the 3rd shot as he was running to keep up. So tell me 88 was the last 2 shots to prevent him from being run over or to kill her?

The one I tagged you in. From his body camera. I even gave you the time stamp.

You watched that video? And you don’t believe she hit him?

 

[MOOOOONEY]

I've seen enough. The new video show only the car not the killing

Then you haven’t watched it.

 

[luthervol]

View attachment 805277

That seems pretty open and shut to me.
Why didn't this come out sooner?

 

[TrumpedUpVol]

I've seen enough. The new video show only the car not the killing

It shows the precise precursor to the incident’s finality.

And it doesn’t portray Mrs. and Mrs. in a very positive light, which should have been obvious to everyone from the get-go.

 

[MAD]

I think she is just a loon that got caught up in a moment with her self-righteous team and went too far.

Yep. And when two self-righteous loons meet.......................................

Impressive, but aren’t you worried the left is gonna accuse you of changing sides?

 

[luthervol]

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

www.justice.gov

Seems significant.......

Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.

 

[swampfoxfan]

It shows the precise precursor to the incident’s finality.

And it doesn’t portray Mrs. and Mrs. in a very positive light, which should have been obvious to everyone from the get-go.

Okee. Dokee

 

[lukeneyland]

It's in the thread and all over the internet. She was an idiot who wanted to act like a bad ass protester and got shot. That kind of stuff works much different on Reddit.

Was it legal to shoot? Yes
Was it what should have happened? Imo probably not.

Yeah there could be a difference between what was legal and what is ethically necessary.

 

[C-south]

This is much more damning. It boggles my mind that this wasn't the very first video released.

The loonies still try and twist it.

 

[C-south]

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

www.justice.gov

Seems significant.......

Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.

You chose not to highlight a lot of relevant points.

 

[hndog609]

I’ve tagged you in it 3x now and you refuse to address it

He's trolling or absolutely, positively doesn't care.

 

[tim]

“Our own base is telling us that what we're doing is not good enough... [that] there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public," one such lawmaker said.

They are predicable. Trump did it, dems protest it.

 

[Vol8188]

He's trolling or absolutely, positively doesn't care.

Even provided the exact time stamp for him

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

Every law enforcement officer has the training to kill someone if need be

Yes, I am aware. LE is trained for an entirely different set of circumstances, with one of the duties being to shoot to kill if necessary. Military personnel are trained heavily on that specificity of killing and exponentially less as to dealing with the American public and the enforcement of our domestic laws.

 

[Majors]

This is much more damning. It boggles my mind that this wasn't the very first video released.

Because those on the streets watching/videoing hit send first.

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

That seems pretty open and shut to me.
Why didn't this come out sooner?

You really have to ask given the Trump stooges at the DOJ? Fealty to the Donald drives their mission and having the authority to drive false narratives

 

[Vol8188]

View attachment 805277

The vehicle wasn’t moving when he stepped in front.

The law you’re sighting is for vehicles already in motion. Meaning you can’t open fire on the interstate and claim all the cars were coming at you

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

The vehicle wasn’t moving when he stepped in front.

The law you’re sighting is for vehicles already in motion. Meaning you can’t open fire on the interstate and claim all the cars were coming at you

Ok

 

[Vol8188]

You really have to ask given the Trump stooges at the DOJ? Fealty to the Donald drives their mission and having the authority to drive false narratives

Have you seen the video from today yet or just up?

 

[Vol8188]

Ok

So we agree this doesn’t apply because the car wasn’t moving when he stepped in front?

Then why even share that?

 

[luthervol]

You chose not to highlight a lot of relevant points.

And what would those points be?

There is no way any reasonable person would conclude that he was in fear for his life without any other options.....such as moving out of the way.

 

[Vol8188]

These losers have to be trolling at this point.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

These losers have to be trolling at this point.

Well you can convince yourself that he could have moved when you look at it frame by frame.

 

[VOLinAL]

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

www.justice.gov

Seems significant.......

Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.

I have no doubt he may have been found to violate policy and be terminated from employment. Policy isn’t law though.