Too much ice

#6,576
#6,576
General Jack said:
Because that's where people are being killed by federal agents?

What would you do if federal agents, during let's say the Obama administration, were killing presumably right-leaning citizens in your neighborhood?
Click to expand...
Weird, WHY are "people being killed by federal agents"?

And again, this is only happening in one 15 block radius in one city....I wonder why?

And I don't care about a person's politics but federal ICE agents were doing the exact same thing during the Obama Administration and deporting tons of people. The difference was that "right-leaning" cities and states and even left leaning ones back then cooperated and assisted and there was minimal conflict. No right leaning citizens are obstructing and assaulting and aiding criminals, and wouldn't
 
#6,578
#6,578
VolinMichigan said:
where are all the “don’t tread on me” folks who hold the 2A as gospel on federal agents masked and not identifying themselves entering homes without warrants? Then blocking state investigators (with an actual warrant) and FBI investigators from carrying out their own independent investigations? States rights over federal government? Where are you at? Saying a guy was trying to massacre agents while legally carrying a concealed weapon and being executed with his hands on the ground? Where are you at? Because it seems like you’re all loving the treading so far.
Click to expand...
There's treading on people they don't like, so it's okay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen and lostsheep
#6,582
#6,582
Rickyvol77 said:
Look at the difference Walz has here versus what he said about the Somali MPD officer who murdered that white woman asking for help a few years back

"When asked about the accusations that the BCA was incompetent and made mistakes in the trial, Walz said, "We have asked for and we're getting all the evidence and the background on where this came from. I need to understand what happened here and what brought up those accusations and to understand whether we can validate them and if we do, what are the processes to move to alleviate that. Let us find the facts before we rush to judgment in this tragedy"
Click to expand...
Walz loves that it is taking focus away from the criminal activity of all the fraud in Minnesota he and his administration have enabled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77 and Majors
#6,587
#6,587
Rickyvol77 said:
Every DA in the country DOES look at these cases and decides if charges need to be filed....this already happens everywhere
Click to expand...
Irrelevant to the point.
Their current system has a real transparency problem. So let’s solve it. Every officer involved shooting goes to the grand jury.


While we’re at it let’s end qualified immunity and go to an insurance system like the medical industry.
An officer has to be insurable to work in law enforcement. If they screw up and get sued insurance pays instead of the taxpayers. This ends the practice of **** cops hanging around or transferring to a new city when the F up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#6,588
#6,588
Rickyvol77 said:
Weird, WHY are "people being killed by federal agents"?

And again, this is only happening in one 15 block radius in one city....I wonder why?

And I don't care about a person's politics but federal ICE agents were doing the exact same thing during the Obama Administration and deporting tons of people. The difference was that "right-leaning" cities and states and even left leaning ones back then cooperated and assisted and there was minimal conflict. No right leaning citizens are obstructing and assaulting and aiding criminals, and wouldn't
Click to expand...
Trump wants to incite a riot so he can then blame the victims. For multiple reasons. ICE doesn't even need to be there, that's why they're protesting. This is all completely unnecessary. TRUMP is the main agitator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen and luthervol
#6,590
#6,590
K-town Vol Fan said:
"Attacking law enforcement" give me a break dude.


**** everyone who voted for this.
Click to expand...
You are the one needing a break "dude". You are jumping to conclusions without all the facts because you want to push a preconceived narrative. You cited a person that shot another armed person while being attacked and tried to compare it to a person armed with a 9MM attacking law enforcement. You make your conclusions that the armed dead man is innocent based on video that doesn't show nearly all the details. Just like the female that used her car to try to ram law enforcement. The initial video showed her speeding towards the officer but the angle was poor and unclear if the officer was in front of the vehicle. Later overhead footage showed the the officer was in fact in front of the vehicle when she gunned it.

I'll withhold judgement until all the facts come out. Early indications are the armed man with 2 extra loaded magazines attacked law enforcement and resisted arrest and the officers were in fear for their lives. The officer may have prevented a mass shooting. But again, I will withhold judgement until all the facts come out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#6,596
#6,596
Orangeslice13 said:
Irrelevant to the point.
Their current system has a real transparency problem. So let’s solve it. Every officer involved shooting goes to the grand jury.


While we’re at it let’s end qualified immunity and go to an insurance system like the medical industry.
An officer has to be insurable to work in law enforcement. If they screw up and get sued insurance pays instead of the taxpayers. This ends the practice of **** cops hanging around or transferring to a new city when the F up.
Click to expand...
Ending qualified immunity would end all law enforcement all together...QI already doesn't cover illegal or unconstitutional things that officers do.

And all officers ARE insurable, every agency out there has a bond that covers them, and again officers can be sued for illegal and unconstitutional things.
 
#6,600
#6,600
Orangeslice13 said:
Maxine waters. As well.
Walz today.
The list goes on and on

No exemptions
Click to expand...
I’ve yet to see the entire Democratic Party endorse and put forward bill after bill authored by Maxine Waters. Maxine Waters was never the president and she certainly didn’t embody an entire political party like Trump does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newarkvol
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top