To Protect and to Serve...

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is how we know the propaganda won out a long time ago.

Interestingly enough I have lived most of my life around people who have formed the basis of this "propoganda". Some may say I speak from experience, but believe what you want.
 
Nothing about using drugs includes logic. Why, knowing its potential to cause an individual to kill, rob, etc would someone partake in the first place?

I know the potential of being killed while driving, I still drive. Life is full of risks. Taking drugs not necessarily overly risky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I know the potential of being killed while driving, I still drive. Life is full of risks. Taking drugs not necessarily overly risky.

True, however in todays society driving serves our needs, (abuse of) drugs have no purpose outside pleasure which is a desire. Not a logical argument.
 
Why is there always a perceived danger in doing nothing? Is this simply the fear tactics used by those in power to justify the rising prison population? Or, is it just the gravy train of revenue rolling along? Meanwhile, the taxpayer suffers and pays for it all.
It's all about funding. The bigger the "threat" the more union members the gestapo gets, the more range time Tim gets to practice murdering people, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Shocking video out of Florida shows police tasering an elderly man despite the fact that his hands are up and he appears to be offering no resistance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYKZS-l5T1w

Why did they taser him? I didn't see him do anything wrong. These cowards need to be reminded who they work for, who they serve.

That's the problem, they know exactly who they work for, the state. It's the state vs you period.
Stop resisting, stop resisting!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Shocking video out of Florida shows police tasering an elderly man despite the fact that his hands are up and he appears to be offering no resistance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYKZS-l5T1w

Why did they taser him? I didn't see him do anything wrong. These cowards need to be reminded who they work for, who they serve.

You didnt see him pulling away from the initial officer? What was the initial traffic stop for? What took him so long to get out of the car? Your eyes see what you want them to see.
 
You didnt see him pulling away from the initial officer? What was the initial traffic stop for? What took him so long to get out of the car? Your eyes see what you want them to see.

You are right my eyes don't want to see garbage like this. I'm sorry, but if you are a cop and need a taser to approach an elderly man, you should not be a cop.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
You didnt see him pulling away from the initial officer? What was the initial traffic stop for? What took him so long to get out of the car? Your eyes see what you want them to see.

Dude... He exits the vehicle with his hands up and though he does appear to pull away (FTR I'm not at all convinced that was an attempt to resist, as that makes no sense when one considers his behavior throughout the rest of the video), he immediately stops and puts his hands back up right before the hero in the yellow vest shoots him in the back with a taser.

Quick question... Let's say you're on the job and you're ruining some 20 year old kid's life over a quarter ounce of pot, writing a single mom a $120 ticket for exceeding some arbitrary speed limit, or whatever it is you do to keep your community safe and you witness me shooting an unarmed elderly gentleman in the back with a taser while his hands are in the air. Is your instinct to to stop and think "Let's not jump to conclusions here... I'm not sure what lead us to this point and he may very well have been justified"?

My guess is no. Yet you and all the other cop sluppers can't wait to give any dingleberry with a badge the benefit of the doubt that there's basically zero percent chance you'd give to Joe citizen. I just find that odd.

You're right though... I mean it did take him a second to exit the car. And though any idiot with an iq above 55 could see he was surrendering, he did kind of pull away for an entire second or two. The old jerk should really be grateful he only got the taser and not the 9mm right?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
Dude... He exits the vehicle with his hands up and though he does appear to pull away (FTR I'm not at all convinced that was an attempt to resist, as that makes no sense when one considers his behavior throughout the rest of the video), he immediately stops and puts his hands back up right before the hero in the yellow vest shoots him in the back with a taser.

Quick question... Let's say you're on the job and you're ruining some 20 year old kid's life over a quarter ounce of pot, writing a single mom a $120 ticket for exceeding some arbitrary speed limit, or whatever it is you do to keep your community safe and you witness me shooting an unarmed elderly gentleman in the back with a taser while his hands are in the air. Is your instinct to to stop and think "Let's not jump to conclusions here... I'm not sure what lead us to this point and he may very well have been justified"?

My guess is no. Yet you and all the other cop sluppers can't wait to give any dingleberry with a badge the benefit of the doubt that there's basically zero percent chance you'd give to Joe citizen. I just find that odd.

You're right though... I mean it did take him a second to exit the car. And though any idiot with an iq above 55 could see he was surrendering, he did kind of pull away for an entire second or two. The old jerk should really be grateful he only got the taser and not the 9mm right?

The clear message that cops are sending the citizens is that you must "submit" to the state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
The article mentioned "3 citizens complaints" that were "unfounded." What makes a complaint "unfounded?" What is the criteria for that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top