Haha, here it is, I guess. If I'm just now hearing about it, 95% of the US hasn't heard about it.
You don't hear about every black male shot and you hear about some white females shot. This month there was a national news story about a white girl shot by cops. Weird.
Denver Police Shoot, Kill Teen Who Struck Officer With Car - ABC News
The regular player said the police told him, The reason were here is there are Asian gangs targeting these games, and its certainly true that some private gambling events in Fairfax County have been robbed by nefarious elements. The player said he wanted to respond, So you robbed us first, but he did not.
Here's another article on the same thing:
Lawmakers eye restricting no-knock warrants, mandating PD cams - CBS46 News
Some of the things I agree with, like the assurance life is in jeopardy before conducting a no-knock, but don't agree with limiting them between certain times. I did notice the bill also makes body cameras mandatory in Georgia.
I really don't understand the push for body cameras. To many variables there, "I forgot to turn it on." "I guess the battery died." And so forth.
I think it's an invaluable tool myself. If something major was missed and the officer "forgot to turn it on" said officer should be disciplined as a minimum. And with repeat problems should face firing or potentially even go to a grand jury depending on the severity of the case. And once there, all benefit of the doubt would fall away from the officer.
Which is not a bad thing at all.
The problem with the bill in Georgia is nobody knows who will pay for it. And some departments are whining about that.
Of course we know the answer to that. The taxpayer.
The current state of technology being what it is, should the officer be required to purchase their own cameras? I wouldn't think they'd be very expensive.
Here is an example.
Amazon.com : 720p HD Mini Metal Camera DVR Police Body Cam : Camcorders : Camera & Photo
Apparently you didn't read the reviews lol I especially liked the review where the guy said he had to tape the mount to the camera
Problem is any camera must be approved for lack of a better term. Department standards and that sort of thing. Certain criteria must be present before it can be admitted into court as evidence. Plus amount of memory available.
I'm not opposed to the department making the initial purchase and having an officer pay it off like they do with a sidearm or patrol rifle.
I'm all about some accountability lol
I have zero problems with accountability. And that happens to be on both ends of the spectrum as the citizens can be just as bad as the officers you all scream about.
You know what will happen though. Say those do get mandated in Georgia. It won't be long before someone files a lawsuit about the cops infringing on their rights by recording them without permission.
