VolsSportsFan
Random
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 76,207
- Likes
- 50,616
That's all you know? Do you know if it was dark where they encountered her, whether she was medicated or intoxicated, whether she had any mental illness, whether she had anything in her hands, whether she disobeyed any commands, what was reported to the officers by dispatch?
No. You don't. And all those things may show that the shooting was unjustified. You don't know yet.
Per the news report I read she was unarmed, talking to officers who had arrived and were still in their vehicle. What scenario is there, whether she was intoxicated or not, that would justify deadly force?
I supposed she could have been reaching into their car trying to strangle an officer, but that seems highly unlikely.
![]()
We don't know, but that didn't stop involuntary from guessing that it's an accident.
What we do know is that they violated department policy by not having their cams on. No matter what happens, their needs to be a stiff punishment (paid leave is not going to cut it) otherwise cops are gonna conclude, "I guess I don't have to have my camera on".
"Good Cop Saves Dog, Gave it Back to Family Days Later, Different Cop Kills It"
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/exclusive-cops-shoots-dog/amp/
I've had two friends shot in the line of duty, multiple shot at, and one of the best friends I'll ever have grab the gun out of a man's hand, something that to this day he can't explain how he reacted so fast all in the line of duty.
So, yeah, when I see what we do deminished to a report, yeah, I get pissed.
I don't know how pointing out that a cop is unlikely to get there fast enough in many scenarios is being misconstrued as offensive. Cops aren't omnipotent and omnipresent, it's not a knock, just a fact. That's why people buy guns for home defense.
Get a grip.
I forbade a few tenants from getting a PB in the past. Probably will again in the future.
That's all you know? Do you know if it was dark where they encountered her, whether she was medicated or intoxicated, whether she had any mental illness, whether she had anything in her hands, whether she disobeyed any commands, what was reported to the officers by dispatch?
No. You don't. And all those things may show that the shooting was unjustified. You don't know yet.
I haven't opined. Your problem is you don't even know what other people are actually saying, in any thread, ever.
We don't know, but that didn't stop involuntary from guessing that it's an accident.
What we do know is that they violated department policy by not having their cams on. No matter what happens, their needs to be a stiff punishment (paid leave is not going to cut it) otherwise cops are gonna conclude, "I guess I don't have to have my camera on".
Per the news report I read she was unarmed, talking to officers who had arrived and were still in their vehicle. What scenario is there, whether she was intoxicated or not, that would justify deadly force?
I supposed she could have been reaching into their car trying to strangle an officer, but that seems highly unlikely.
![]()
You don't even know what you post your freakin' self. any time, all the time, in any thread. You're the most delusional poster on this site besides Highchair of course.
Link?
I've read none of that, at all.
Thanks, but all that says is that they did not find a weapon nearby. It says nothing about the other claims about her approaching the officers as they were in their cars, her actions, their actions, etc.
I'm not saying it was justified. But I don't know enough to conclude otherwise.
