To Protect and to Serve II

#5,129
#5,129
GreyWolf1129 said:
Your assertion is incorrect, however...it IS your right to be wrong.

I hope no one ever gets hurt, including you, because of your flawed assumptions. All I ask is that, if you really believe that, please do not get confrontational with anyone who in fact does have legal standing to be on your property, whether you understand it or not.

My home is my castle, and I live in a "Castle Doctrine" state. But there are limits, and restrictions, on what I can and cannot do if someone enters on to my property with legal standing. If you think this is all about "cops", it's not. It extends to utility workers as well, for example.

I agree with your premise, but as is the case with all things, it pays to read the fine print.

:hi:
Click to expand...
Interesting story right here...

Houston Brothers trial(s) in Roane County - VolNation
 
#5,134
#5,134
Rasputin_Vol said:
Interesting story right here...

Houston Brothers trial(s) in Roane County - VolNation
Click to expand...

I'm familiar. And you're intelligent enough to know that this is an example of how two wrongs don't make a right.

You're cherry-picking, Ras. If you have to use this incident to make your point, you don't have a point. This was a modern day Hatfield & McCoy story. Both sides were wrong.

But I'll counter. 2009. Lakewood, Washington. Any idea what they did wrong?

I'm sure Rocky or Leon could explain it to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,139
#5,139
golfballs said:
Interesting case

Supreme Court backs Arizona policeman accused of excessive force | Reuters
Click to expand...

A couple of questions come to mind right off the bat.

1. Why are university police responding to an off campus home instead of the Tuscon police?

2. Since they were off campus and, apparently outside of these officers jurisdiction, wouldn't they be acting as private citizens instead of LEO?

3. And if number 2 is the case, shouldn't that prevent them from being able to "hide behind the badge" in this case?
 
#5,142
#5,142
MyBloodRunnethOrange said:
A couple of questions come to mind right off the bat.

1. Why are university police responding to an off campus home instead of the Tuscon police?

2. Since they were off campus and, apparently outside of these officers jurisdiction, wouldn't they be acting as private citizens instead of LEO?

3. And if number 2 is the case, shouldn't that prevent them from being able to "hide behind the badge" in this case?
Click to expand...

Stop resisting.
 
#5,144
#5,144
Illinois Town Bypasses Constitution, US Citizens Given 60 Days To Turn In Guns Or Become Criminals



Predictably, law enforcement and retired law enforcement members of the community are exempted from the ban. Currently, in the U.S., law enforcement kills around 1,200 citizens per year. Ironically, that number is actually four times higher than those who die from rifles.

As TFTP has reported, cops have killed 450 percent more people than have died in the past forty years of mass shootings.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,149
#5,149
Rasputin_Vol said:
Do you see anything wrong with this cop exemption?
Click to expand...

No I agree with you. Of course it’s crap.

When we saw it we knew you were gonna lose your damn mind over it though😬

I wouldn’t sweat it. The NRA has thrown their resources behind it and it violates FOPA1986. It shouldn’t survive appeal. 👍
 
#5,150
#5,150
NorthDallas40 said:
No I agree with you. Of course it’s crap.

When we saw it we knew you were gonna lose your damn mind over it though😬

I wouldn’t sweat it. The NRA has thrown their resources behind it and it violates FOPA1986. It shouldn’t survive appeal. 👍
Click to expand...

If anything, the cops should the ones disarmed, not the citizens...

As TFTP has reported, cops have killed 450 percent more people than have died in the past forty years of mass shootings.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top